These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19840974)

  • 1. The importance of failure: feedback-related negativity predicts motor learning efficiency.
    van der Helden J; Boksem MA; Blom JH
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Jul; 20(7):1596-603. PubMed ID: 19840974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mediofrontal negativities in the absence of responding.
    Donkers FC; Nieuwenhuis S; van Boxtel GJ
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):777-87. PubMed ID: 16249075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subprocesses of performance monitoring: a dissociation of error processing and response competition revealed by event-related fMRI and ERPs.
    Ullsperger M; von Cramon DY
    Neuroimage; 2001 Dec; 14(6):1387-401. PubMed ID: 11707094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brain potentials related to self-generated and external information used for performance monitoring.
    Müller SV; Möller J; Rodriguez-Fornells A; Münte TF
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jan; 116(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 15589185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learning to become an expert: reinforcement learning and the acquisition of perceptual expertise.
    Krigolson OE; Pierce LJ; Holroyd CB; Tanaka JW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Sep; 21(9):1834-41. PubMed ID: 18823237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physiological correlates of learning by performance feedback in children: a study of EEG event-related potentials and evoked heart rate.
    Groen Y; Wijers AA; Mulder LJ; Minderaa RB; Althaus M
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Oct; 76(3):174-87. PubMed ID: 17888560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The feedback-related negativity is modulated by feedback probability in observational learning.
    Kobza S; Thoma P; Daum I; Bellebaum C
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Dec; 225(2):396-404. PubMed ID: 21846482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feedback-related processes during a time-production task in young and older adults.
    Wild-Wall N; Willemssen R; Falkenstein M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Feb; 120(2):407-13. PubMed ID: 19109056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of learning on feedback-related brain potentials in a decision-making task.
    Sailer U; Fischmeister FP; Bauer H
    Brain Res; 2010 Jun; 1342():85-93. PubMed ID: 20423704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The good, the bad and the neutral: electrophysiological responses to feedback stimuli.
    Holroyd CB; Hajcak G; Larsen JT
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 16427615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fast and slow brain rhythms in rule/expectation violation tasks: focusing on evaluation processes by excluding motor action.
    Tzur G; Berger A
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Mar; 198(2):420-8. PubMed ID: 19100781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feedback-related brain potential activity complies with basic assumptions of associative learning theory.
    Luque D; López FJ; Marco-Pallares J; Càmara E; Rodríguez-Fornells A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Apr; 24(4):794-808. PubMed ID: 21981667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developmental differences in learning and error processing: evidence from ERPs.
    Eppinger B; Mock B; Kray J
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Sep; 46(5):1043-53. PubMed ID: 19497006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Better or worse than expected? Aging, learning, and the ERN.
    Eppinger B; Kray J; Mock B; Mecklinger A
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(2):521-39. PubMed ID: 17936313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of interpersonal competition on monitoring internal and external error feedback.
    Van Meel CS; Van Heijningen CA
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Mar; 47(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 20074085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aging, probabilistic learning and performance monitoring.
    Pietschmann M; Endrass T; Czerwon B; Kathmann N
    Biol Psychol; 2011 Jan; 86(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 21056080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Action-effect negativity: irrelevant action effects are monitored like relevant feedback.
    Band GP; van Steenbergen H; Ridderinkhof KR; Falkenstein M; Hommel B
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec; 82(3):211-8. PubMed ID: 19665516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Remedial action and feedback processing in a time-estimation task: evidence for a role of the rostral cingulate zone in behavioral adjustments without learning.
    van der Veen FM; Röder CH; Mies GW; van der Lugt A; Smits M
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jan; 54(1):447-54. PubMed ID: 20709177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance monitoring in the anterior cingulate is not all error related: expectancy deviation and the representation of action-outcome associations.
    Oliveira FT; McDonald JJ; Goodman D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 19(12):1994-2004. PubMed ID: 17892382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Developmental differences in error-related ERPs in middle- to late-adolescent males.
    Santesso DL; Segalowitz SJ
    Dev Psychol; 2008 Jan; 44(1):205-17. PubMed ID: 18194018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.