BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19841013)

  • 1. Noise model application to small hydroelectrical power plants impact evaluation in the Aosta Valley territory.
    Tibone C; Agnesod G; Cappio Borlino M; Tartin C; Crea D; Berlier F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Dec; 137(3-4):271-4. PubMed ID: 19841013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Urban exposure to ELF magnetic field due to high-, medium- and low-voltage electricity supply networks.
    Bottura V; Cappio Borlino M; Carta N; Cerise L; Imperial E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Dec; 137(3-4):214-7. PubMed ID: 19843546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact to public and environment of NORM industries in Italy.
    Trotti F; Liziero F; Zampieri C; De Zolt S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Dec; 137(3-4):310-3. PubMed ID: 19880414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A technical note about Phidel: a new software for evaluating magnetic induction field generated by power lines.
    Comelli M; Benes M; Bampo A; Villalta R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 123(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 16936291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methodological and metrological issues in the evaluation of noise pollution indicators in residential environment.
    Sepulcri D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Dec; 137(3-4):266-70. PubMed ID: 19880415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acoustic survey of quiet areas and long-range anthropogenic noise.
    Conte A; Balzano M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Dec; 137(3-4):256-60. PubMed ID: 19828721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determination of the source rate released into the environment from a nuclear power plant.
    Jeong HJ; Kim EH; Suh KS; Hwang WT; Han MH; Lee HK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 15687109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ELF field in the proximity of complex power line configuration measurement procedures.
    Benes M; Comelli M; Villalta R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 16410292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measurements of environmental background radiation at location of coal-fired power plants.
    Adrovic F; Prokić M; Ninković MM; Glisić R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 112(3):439-42. PubMed ID: 15385680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Radiometabolic therapy: dose equivalents from external exposure and internal contamination].
    Scielzo G; Rivolta A
    Radiol Med; 1998 Jun; 95(6):663-8. PubMed ID: 9717552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Applicability of an exposure model for the determination of emissions from mobile phone base stations.
    Breckenkamp J; Neitzke HP; Bornkessel C; Berg-Beckhoff G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(4):474-81. PubMed ID: 18676976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relative accuracy of grid references derived from postcode and address in UK epidemiological studies of overhead power lines.
    Swanson J; Vincent TJ; Bunch KJ
    J Radiol Prot; 2014 Dec; 34(4):N81-6. PubMed ID: 25325707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of natural background dose rates for residents of the Amargosa Valley, NV, to those in Leadville, CO, and the states of Colorado and Nevada.
    Moeller DW; Sun LS
    Health Phys; 2006 Oct; 91(4):338-53. PubMed ID: 16966877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative evaluation of personal exposure to UV radiation of workers and general public.
    Sisto R; Borra M; Casale GR; Militello A; Siani AM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Dec; 137(3-4):193-6. PubMed ID: 19841017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The chornobyl accident: estimation of radiation doses received by the Baltic and Ukrainian cleanup workers.
    Bouville A; Chumak VV; Inskip PD; Kryuchkov V; Luckyanov N
    Radiat Res; 2006 Jul; 166(1 Pt 2):158-67. PubMed ID: 16808604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of geographic location on population exposure to emissions from power plants throughout China.
    Zhou Y; Levy JI; Evans JS; Hammitt JK
    Environ Int; 2006 Apr; 32(3):365-73. PubMed ID: 16183123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors affecting dose estimates for long-term performance assessments: case study-Armagosa Valley.
    Moeller DW; Ryan MT; Sun LS
    Health Phys; 2007 Feb; 92(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 17220714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Energy and direction distribution of neutrons in workplace fields: implication of the results from the EVIDOS project for the set-up of simulated workplace fields.
    Luszik-Bhadra M; Lacoste V; Reginatto M; Zimbal A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 126(1-4):151-4. PubMed ID: 17519241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiation sources in the environment near NPP Temelin.
    Thinova L; Matolin M; Ploc O; Cechak T
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2010; 68(4-5):848-53. PubMed ID: 19853465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noise action plan of agglomerations: sustainable hypothesis or utopy?
    Magri SL; Masera S; Fogola J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Dec; 137(3-4):261-5. PubMed ID: 19841018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.