157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19841019)
1. Review of open problems in assessing compliance with 2004/40/EC directive exposure limit values for low-frequency current density by means of numerical techniques.
Zoppetti N; Andreuccetti D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Dec; 137(3-4):247-51. PubMed ID: 19841019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of the surface averaging procedure of the current density in assessing compliance with the ICNIRP low-frequency basic restrictions by means of numerical techniques.
Zoppetti N; Andreuccetti D
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4835-48. PubMed ID: 19622850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Numerical dosimetry ELF: accuracy of the method, variability of models and parameters, and the implication for quantifying guidelines.
Bahr A; Bolz T; Hennes C
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):521-30. PubMed ID: 17495652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recent advances in research relevant to electric and magnetic field exposure guidelines.
Kavet R; Bailey WH; Bracken TD; Patterson RM
Bioelectromagnetics; 2008 Oct; 29(7):499-526. PubMed ID: 18618584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Requirements for reliable worst-case assessment of human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields with known uncertainty.
Christ A
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):554-64. PubMed ID: 17495656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of critical situations in the evaluation of human exposure to magnetic fields with complex waveforms.
Crotti G; Giordano D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Dec; 137(3-4):227-30. PubMed ID: 19854853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Revision of the Euratom Basic Safety Standards Directive--current status.
Mundigl S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):12-6. PubMed ID: 20959342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of complex EMF exposure situations including inhomogeneous field distribution.
Jokela K
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):531-40. PubMed ID: 17495653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rapporteur Report: ICNIRP international workshop on EMF dosimetry and biophysical aspects relevant to setting exposure guidelines.
Roy CR
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):658-67. PubMed ID: 17495669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Different basic dosimetric quantities for the characterization of exposure to low-frequency electric and magnetic fields and the implication for practical exposure conditions and guidelines.
Martens L
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):515-20. PubMed ID: 17495651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of important international and national standards for limiting exposure to EMF including the scientific rationale.
Roy CR; Martin LJ
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):635-41. PubMed ID: 17495666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the issues related to compliance of LF pulsed exposures with safety standards and guidelines.
De Santis V; Chen XL; Laakso I; Hirata A
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 58(24):8597-607. PubMed ID: 24254334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Static fields: biological effects and mechanisms relevant to exposure limits.
van Rongen E; Saunders RD; van Deventer ET; Repacholi MH
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):584-90. PubMed ID: 17495659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Setting radon-specific release criteria and demonstrating compliance for land affected by NORM.
García-Talavera M; Martínez M; Matarranz JL; Ramos L
Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Nov; 66(11):1567-71. PubMed ID: 18508275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of non-sinusoidal, pulsed, or intermittent exposure to low frequency electric and magnetic fields.
Heinrich H
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):541-6. PubMed ID: 17495654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the use of advanced numerical models for the evaluation of dosimetric parameters and the verification of exposure limits at workplaces.
Catarinucci L; Tarricone L
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Dec; 137(3-4):218-22. PubMed ID: 19846463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A simplified procedure for dosimetric evaluations on ELF sources with complex waveforms.
Andreuccetti D; Priori S; Zoppetti N
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Dec; 137(3-4):201-5. PubMed ID: 19841016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Historical review of RF exposure standards and the International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety (ICES).
Osepchuk JM; Petersen RC
Bioelectromagnetics; 2003; Suppl 6():S7-16. PubMed ID: 14628304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. FDTD analysis of human body-core temperature elevation due to RF far-field energy prescribed in the ICNIRP guidelines.
Hirata A; Asano T; Fujiwara O
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):5013-23. PubMed ID: 17671350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exposure of biological material to ultra-wideband electromagnetic pulses: dosimetric implications.
Simicevic N
Health Phys; 2007 Jun; 92(6):574-83. PubMed ID: 17495658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
