These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1984126)

  • 1. The impact of nonclinical factors on repeat cesarean section.
    Stafford RS
    JAMA; 1991 Jan; 265(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 1984126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relationship between cesarean section and labor induction.
    Wilson BL; Effken J; Butler RJ
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2010 Jun; 42(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 20618597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variability and consistency of rates of primary and repeat cesarean sections among hospitals in two states.
    Rock SM
    Public Health Rep; 1993; 108(4):514-6. PubMed ID: 8341789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Socioeconomic factors and the odds of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
    King DE; Lahiri K
    JAMA; 1994 Aug; 272(7):524-9. PubMed ID: 8046806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Practice variation of vaginal birth after cesarean and the influence of risk factors at patient level: a retrospective cohort study.
    Vankan E; Schoorel EN; van Kuijk SM; Mol BJ; Nijhuis JG; Aardenburg R; Alink M; de Boer K; Delemarre FM; Dirksen CD; van Dooren IM; Franssen MT; Kaplan M; Kleiverda G; Kuppens SM; Kwee A; Langenveld J; Lim FT; Melman S; Sikkema MJ; Smits LJ; Visser H; Woiski M; Scheepers HC; Hermens RP
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Feb; 96(2):158-165. PubMed ID: 27861697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of the HealthChoice program on cesarean section and vaginal birth after C-section deliveries: a retrospective analysis.
    Misra A
    Matern Child Health J; 2008 Mar; 12(2):266-74. PubMed ID: 17549614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Elective repeat cesarean sections: how many could be vaginal births?
    Norman P; Kostovcik S; Lanning A
    CMAJ; 1993 Aug; 149(4):431-5. PubMed ID: 8348425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Health maintenance organizations, independent practice associations, and cesarean section rates.
    Tussing AD; Wojtowycz MA
    Health Serv Res; 1994 Apr; 29(1):75-93. PubMed ID: 8163381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cesarean section use and source of payment: an analysis of California hospital discharge abstracts.
    Stafford RS
    Am J Public Health; 1990 Mar; 80(3):313-5. PubMed ID: 2305912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Study probes increase in cesarean rate.
    Kuehn BM
    JAMA; 2010 Oct; 304(15):1658. PubMed ID: 20959570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship of insurance status, hospital ownership, and teaching status with interhospital transfers in California in 2000.
    Green A; Showstack J; Rennie D; Goldman L
    Acad Med; 2005 Aug; 80(8):774-9. PubMed ID: 16043535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Green Bay cesarean section study. III. Falling cesarean birth rates without a formal curtailment program.
    Sandmire HF; DeMott RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1790-9; discussion 1799-802. PubMed ID: 8203440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variations in the use of cesarean delivery for dystocia: lessons about the source of care.
    McCloskey L; Petitti DB; Hobel CJ
    Med Care; 1992 Feb; 30(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 1736018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do laborists improve delivery outcomes for laboring women in California community hospitals?
    Feldman DS; Bollman DL; Fridman M; Korst LM; El Haj Ibrahim S; Fink A; Gregory KD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 213(4):587.e1-587.e13. PubMed ID: 26026921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cesarean section: analysis of the experience before and after the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.
    Soliman SR; Burrows RF
    CMAJ; 1993 Apr; 148(8):1315-20. PubMed ID: 8462053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maternal request CS--role of hospital teaching status and for-profit ownership.
    Xirasagar S; Lin HC
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 May; 132(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16837120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk-adjusted measurement of primary cesarean sections: reliable assessment of the quality of obstetrical services.
    Pasternak DP; Pine M; Nolan K; French R
    Qual Manag Health Care; 1999; 8(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 10662103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physician incentives and the timing of cesarean sections: evidence from California.
    Spetz J; Smith MW; Ennis SF
    Med Care; 2001 Jun; 39(6):536-50. PubMed ID: 11404639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. U.S. cesarean and VBAC rates stalled in the mid-1990s.
    Curtin SC; Kozak LJ; Gregory KD
    Birth; 2000 Mar; 27(1):54-7. PubMed ID: 10865562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical indications associated with primary cesarean birth.
    Edmonds JK
    Nurs Womens Health; 2014; 18(3):243-9. PubMed ID: 24939202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.