235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19841495)
1. Methodology of diagnostic tests in hepatology.
Christensen E
Ann Hepatol; 2009; 8(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 19841495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Understanding diagnostic tests 3: Receiver operating characteristic curves.
Akobeng AK
Acta Paediatr; 2007 May; 96(5):644-7. PubMed ID: 17376185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests.
Greiner M; Pfeiffer D; Smith RD
Prev Vet Med; 2000 May; 45(1-2):23-41. PubMed ID: 10802332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic test accuracy of nutritional tools used to identify undernutrition in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
Håkonsen SJ; Pedersen PU; Bath-Hextall F; Kirkpatrick P
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 May; 13(4):141-87. PubMed ID: 26447079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests.
Barrett BJ; Fardy JM
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2249():319-333. PubMed ID: 33871852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of diagnostic tests using relative operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the differential positive rate. An example using the total serum bile acid concentration and the alanine aminotransferase activity in the diagnosis of canine hepatobiliary diseases.
Jensen AL; Poulsen JS
Zentralbl Veterinarmed A; 1992 Nov; 39(9):656-68. PubMed ID: 1455934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Research Methods: Diagnostic Test Characteristics.
Mediratta RP; Newman TB; Wang ME
Hosp Pediatr; 2023 Jun; 13(6):e164-e169. PubMed ID: 37144292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A principled approach to setting optimal diagnostic thresholds: where ROC and indifference curves meet.
Irwin RJ; Irwin TC
Eur J Intern Med; 2011 Jun; 22(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 21570638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
Johnson NP
Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2257-66. PubMed ID: 15236429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curve: principles and application in biology].
Delacour H; Servonnet A; Perrot A; Vigezzi JF; Ramirez JM
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2005; 63(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 15771972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic tests: a statistical review.
Schulzer M
Muscle Nerve; 1994 Jul; 17(7):815-9. PubMed ID: 8008012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of diagnostic tests.
Fardy JM
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 473():127-36. PubMed ID: 19160735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the discriminatory and predictive accuracy of the RDT against the microscopy in the diagnosis of malaria among under-five children in Nigeria.
Fagbamigbe AF
Malar J; 2019 Feb; 18(1):46. PubMed ID: 30791912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The agreement chart as an alternative to the receiver-operating characteristic curve for diagnostic tests.
Bangdiwala SI; Haedo AS; Natal ML; Villaveces A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):866-74. PubMed ID: 18687288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Internal validation of a scoring system to evaluate the probability of ureteral stones: The CHOKAI score.
Fukuhara H; Ichiyanagi O; Midorikawa S; Kakizaki H; Kaneko H; Tsuchiya N
Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Dec; 35(12):1859-1866. PubMed ID: 28633903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of diagnostic tests.
Fardy JM; Barrett BJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1281():289-300. PubMed ID: 25694317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A non-inferiority test for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired partial areas under ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1762-76. PubMed ID: 17968858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitivity, specificity, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and likelihood ratios: communicating the performance of diagnostic tests.
Florkowski CM
Clin Biochem Rev; 2008 Aug; 29 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S83-7. PubMed ID: 18852864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies involving binormal ROC curve indices.
Obuchowski NA; McClish DK
Stat Med; 1997 Jul; 16(13):1529-42. PubMed ID: 9249923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology.
Obuchowski NA
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 14519861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
