235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19841495)
21. Diagnostic accuracy of the Molteno Adapted Scale for developmental delay in South African toddlers.
Honeth I; Laughton B; Springer PE; Cotton MF; Pretorius C
Paediatr Int Child Health; 2019 May; 39(2):132-138. PubMed ID: 30328387
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Diagnostic accuracy measures.
Eusebi P
Cerebrovasc Dis; 2013; 36(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 24135733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Measures of accuracy and performance of diagnostic tests.
Drobatz KJ
J Vet Cardiol; 2009 May; 11 Suppl 1():S33-40. PubMed ID: 19451045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Statistical methodology: III. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
Grzybowski M; Younger JG
Acad Emerg Med; 1997 Aug; 4(8):818-26. PubMed ID: 9262704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Using evidence to determine diagnostic test efficacy.
Replogle WH; Johnson WD; Hoover KW
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2009; 6(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 19413584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for diagnostic examinations with uninterpretable cases.
Lu Y; Heller DN; Zhao S
Stat Med; 2002 Jul; 21(13):1849-65. PubMed ID: 12111893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. ROC-ing along: Evaluation and interpretation of receiver operating characteristic curves.
Carter JV; Pan J; Rai SN; Galandiuk S
Surgery; 2016 Jun; 159(6):1638-1645. PubMed ID: 26962006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A Bayesian approach to toxicological testing.
Felli JC; Leishman DJ
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2020 Sep; 105():106898. PubMed ID: 32735877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Novel tests for evaluating two ROC curves under paired samples.
Hwang YT; Wang CC
J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(3):501-517. PubMed ID: 28541824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A readers' guide to the interpretation of diagnostic test properties: clinical example of sepsis.
Fischer JE; Bachmann LM; Jaeschke R
Intensive Care Med; 2003 Jul; 29(7):1043-51. PubMed ID: 12734652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Use of likelihood ratios for comparisons of binary diagnostic tests: underlying ROC curves.
Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5821-30. PubMed ID: 21158294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Guidelines for diagnostic tests and diagnostic accuracy in surgical research.
Jones CM; Ashrafian H; Darzi A; Athanasiou T
J Invest Surg; 2010 Feb; 23(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 20233006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Slopes of a receiver operating characteristic curve and likelihood ratios for a diagnostic test.
Choi BC
Am J Epidemiol; 1998 Dec; 148(11):1127-32. PubMed ID: 9850136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves: The Basics and Beyond.
Chang PW; Newman TB
Hosp Pediatr; 2024 Jul; 14(7):e330-e334. PubMed ID: 38932727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. ROC curves and the areas under them for dichotomized tests: empirical findings for logistically and normally distributed diagnostic test results.
van der Schouw YT; Straatman H; Verbeek AL
Med Decis Making; 1994; 14(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 7808212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. On determining the most appropriate test cut-off value: the case of tests with continuous results.
Habibzadeh F; Habibzadeh P; Yadollahie M
Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2016 Oct; 26(3):297-307. PubMed ID: 27812299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Academic calculations versus clinical judgments: practicing physicians' use of quantitative measures of test accuracy.
Reid MC; Lane DA; Feinstein AR
Am J Med; 1998 Apr; 104(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 9576412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mathematical tools for demonstrating the clinical usefulness of biochemical markers.
Boyd JC
Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1997; 227():46-63. PubMed ID: 9127468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Criteria for evaluating the performance and utility of a diagnostic test].
Mancini J; Gaudart J; Giorgi R
Med Trop (Mars); 2009 Feb; 69(1):78-82. PubMed ID: 19499742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
