BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19842097)

  • 1. Commentary on 'Measurement in clinical trials: a neglected issue for statisticians?'.
    Wittes J
    Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(26):3220-2; discussion 3223-5. PubMed ID: 19842097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Commentary on 'Measurement in clinical trials: a neglected issue for statisticians?'.
    Lubsen J
    Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(26):3215-7; discussion 3223-5. PubMed ID: 19842101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Commentary on 'Measurement in clinical trials: a neglected issue for statisticians?'.
    Lewis JA
    Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(26):3213-4; discussion 3223-5. PubMed ID: 19842100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Commentary on 'Measurement in clinical trials: a neglected issue for statisticians?'.
    van Houwelingen HC
    Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(26):3218-9; discussion 3223-5. PubMed ID: 19842098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement in clinical trials: a neglected issue for statisticians?
    Senn S; Julious S
    Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(26):3189-209. PubMed ID: 19455540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Commentary on 'Measurement in clinical trials: a neglected issue for statisticians?'.
    Farewell VT; Tom BD
    Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(26):3210-2; discussion 3223-5. PubMed ID: 19842099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Back to basics: explaining sample size in outcome trials, are statisticians doing a thorough job?
    Carroll KJ
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(4):333-45. PubMed ID: 19180520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The analysis of 2 × 2 contingency tables--yet again.
    Richardson JT
    Stat Med; 2011 Apr; 30(8):890; author reply 891-2. PubMed ID: 21432882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistics and the relationship of clinical research to clinical practice.
    Khuder SA; Kahaleh B
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Feb; 36(2):219-20. PubMed ID: 19208555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How many repeated measurements are useful?
    Overall JE
    J Clin Psychol; 1996 May; 52(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 8835686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A review of the limitations of statistical analysis of treatment outcomes used in periodontal research.
    Galgut PN
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2003 Oct; 5(4):92-7. PubMed ID: 14604057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reporting and interpreting results of systematic reviews.
    Harvey L; Wyndaele JJ
    Spinal Cord; 2009 Nov; 47(11):777. PubMed ID: 19890366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [ The ABC's of medical statistics. Reading and understanding clinical trials ].
    Labenz J; Kunz CU
    Radiologe; 2011 Jan; 51(1):65-75; quiz 76. PubMed ID: 21243463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical trials in mental health.
    Dunn G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2010 Jun; 19(3):203-4. PubMed ID: 20603417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biostatistics 301. Repeated measurement analysis.
    Chan YH
    Singapore Med J; 2004 Aug; 45(8):354-68; quiz 369. PubMed ID: 15284929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stochastic curtailment of health questionnaires: a method to reduce respondent burden.
    Finkelman MD; He Y; Kim W; Lai AM
    Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(16):1989-2004. PubMed ID: 21520454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical trials and the response rate illusion.
    Kirsch I; Moncrieff J
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Jul; 28(4):348-51. PubMed ID: 17182286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Composite endpoints in clinical trials].
    Ferreira-González I; Alonso-Coello P; Solà I; Pacheco-Huergo V; Domingo-Salvany A; Alonso J; Montori V; Permanyer-Miralda G
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2008 Mar; 61(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 18361902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An efficient test for the analysis of dichotomized variables when the reliability is known.
    Borm GF; Munneke M; Lemmers O; van Zuijlen M
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3498-510. PubMed ID: 16981185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
    Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
    Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.