BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1984214)

  • 1. Tightening the ship.
    Pitkin RM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jan; 77(1):142-4. PubMed ID: 1984214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Committee on Publication Ethics flow charts on suspected publication misconduct.
    Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
    Maturitas; 2009 Mar; 62(3):208-24. PubMed ID: 19329007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Duplicate publication Part 1. Consideration of the issues.
    Davidhizar R; Newman Giger J
    Nurse Author Ed; 2002; 12(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 12092429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Misconduct and fraud in science].
    Draml W
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1999 Dec; 111(24):1007-8. PubMed ID: 10677886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scientific credit and credibility.
    Grant PM
    Nat Mater; 2002 Nov; 1(3):139-41. PubMed ID: 12618792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Misconduct in science: does family medicine have a problem?
    Berg AO
    Fam Med; 1990; 22(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 2182360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Facing up to fraud.
    Nat Mater; 2002 Nov; 1(3):137. PubMed ID: 12618791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Journals: redundant publications are bad news.
    Mojon-Azzi SM; Jiang X; Wagner U; Mojon DS
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209. PubMed ID: 12529610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Salami slicing, shotgunning, and the ethics of authorship.
    Rogers LF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Aug; 173(2):265. PubMed ID: 10430115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A tale of two citations.
    Errami M; Garner H
    Nature; 2008 Jan; 451(7177):397-9. PubMed ID: 18216832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Duplicate or fraudulent publications.
    Meakins JL
    Can J Surg; 2001 Dec; 44(6):405-6. PubMed ID: 11764869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Special report: taking on the cheats.
    Nature; 2005 May; 435(7040):258-9. PubMed ID: 15902219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Another plagiarised paper in Preglad Lekarski.
    Władysław Sułowicz
    Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(11):738. PubMed ID: 10970211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientific authorship. Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines.
    Claxton LD
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jan; 589(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 15652225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A few words concerning the editorial note about the confirmation of plagiarism with regard to eight published articles by Dr. Andrzej Jendryczko].
    Wroński M
    Wiad Lek; 1998; 51(5-6):306-9. PubMed ID: 9867694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethical misconduct in publishing: the authors' perspective.
    Belyaev O
    World J Surg; 2007 Feb; 31(2):438-9; author reply 440-1. PubMed ID: 17219272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Simultaneous publication, fragmented publication (or "salami") and duplicate publication, problems to avoid for the good of all].
    Rev Enferm; 1994; 17(191-2):9. PubMed ID: 8079087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scientific misconduct. Hall probe continues; no 'willful' fraud.
    Dayton L
    Science; 2002 Apr; 296(5568):641. PubMed ID: 11976422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Authorship and misconduct.
    Forsdyke DR
    Nature; 1994 Jul; 370(6485):91. PubMed ID: 8022492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Duplicate publication--An unacceptable practice.
    Scanes CG
    Poult Sci; 2009 Mar; 88(3):455. PubMed ID: 19211512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.