These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1984310)

  • 1. Valve and great vessel stenosis: assessment with MR jet velocity mapping.
    Kilner PJ; Firmin DN; Rees RS; Martinez J; Pennell DJ; Mohiaddin RH; Underwood SR; Longmore DB
    Radiology; 1991 Jan; 178(1):229-35. PubMed ID: 1984310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic resonance jet velocity mapping in mitral and aortic valve stenosis.
    Kilner PJ; Manzara CC; Mohiaddin RH; Pennell DJ; Sutton MG; Firmin DN; Underwood SR; Longmore DB
    Circulation; 1993 Apr; 87(4):1239-48. PubMed ID: 8462150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MRI phase contrast velocity and flow errors in turbulent stenotic jets.
    O'Brien KR; Cowan BR; Jain M; Stewart RA; Kerr AJ; Young AA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jul; 28(1):210-8. PubMed ID: 18581344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cine gradient-echo MR imaging and MR velocity mapping in the evaluation of congenital heart disease.
    Rebergen SA; Niezen RA; Helbing WA; van der Wall EE; de Roos A
    Radiographics; 1996 May; 16(3):467-81. PubMed ID: 8897617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging for managing patients with prosthetic carbon valve in the mitral position].
    Koito H; Imai Y; Suzuki J; Ohkubo N; Nakamura C; Takahashi H; Iwasaka T; Inada M
    J Cardiol; 1997 Nov; 30(5):251-63. PubMed ID: 9395956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The accuracy of magnetic resonance phase velocity measurements in stenotic flow.
    Siegel JM; Oshinski JN; Pettigrew RI; Ku DN
    J Biomech; 1996 Dec; 29(12):1665-72. PubMed ID: 8945670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Poststenotic signal loss in MR angiography: effects of echo time, flow compensation, and fractional echo.
    Evans AJ; Richardson DB; Tien R; MacFall JR; Hedlund LW; Heinz ER; Boyko O; Sostman HD
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1993; 14(3):721-9. PubMed ID: 8517365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Poststenotic flow in MRT: phantom measurements using spin-echo and gradient-echo sequences].
    Spielmann RP; Thiele F; Heller M; Bücheler E
    Digitale Bilddiagn; 1989 Jun; 9(2):55-8. PubMed ID: 2752673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic resonance velocity mapping.
    Underwood SR; Firmin DN; Rees RS; Longmore DB
    Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1990; 11 Suppl A():37-43. PubMed ID: 2286046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Arterial switch procedure for D-transposition of the great arteries: quantitative midterm evaluation of hemodynamic changes with cine MR imaging and phase-shift velocity mapping-initial experience.
    Gutberlet M; Boeckel T; Hosten N; Vogel M; Kühne T; Oellinger H; Ehrenstein T; Venz S; Hetzer R; Bein G; Felix R
    Radiology; 2000 Feb; 214(2):467-75. PubMed ID: 10671595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Heart motion-adapted MR velocity mapping of blood velocity distribution downstream of aortic valve prostheses: initial experience.
    Kozerke S; Hasenkam JM; Nygaard H; Paulsen PK; Pedersen EM; Boesiger P
    Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):548-55. PubMed ID: 11161177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aortic valve pressure gradients in patients with aortic valve stenosis: quantification with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging.
    Eichenberger AC; Jenni R; von Schulthess GK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 May; 160(5):971-7. PubMed ID: 8470612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic resonance velocity imaging: a new method for prosthetic heart valve study.
    Walker PG; Pedersen EM; Oyre S; Flepp L; Ringgaard S; Heinrich RS; Walton SP; Hasenkam JM; Jorgensen HS; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1995 May; 4(3):296-307. PubMed ID: 7655694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection and quantification of valvular heart disease with dynamic cardiac MR imaging.
    Didier D; Ratib O; Lerch R; Friedli B
    Radiographics; 2000; 20(5):1279-99; discussion 1299-301. PubMed ID: 10992018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Noninvasive assessment of valve lesions with Doppler ultrasound.
    Hatle L
    Herz; 1984 Aug; 9(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 6479831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of the pressure gradient in children with coarctation of the aorta by low-field magnetic resonance imaging.
    Rupprecht T; Nitz W; Wagner M; Kreissler P; Rascher W; Hofbeck M
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2002; 23(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 11889521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro agreement between magnetic resonance imaging and intraluminal Doppler ultrasound for high flow velocity measurements.
    Matre K; Ersland L; Larsen TH; Andersen E
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2002 May; 36(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 12079639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of peak velocity in stenotic areas: echocardiography versus k-t SENSE accelerated MR Fourier velocity encoding.
    Baltes C; Hansen MS; Tsao J; Kozerke S; Rezavi R; Pedersen EM; Boesiger P
    Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):249-57. PubMed ID: 17951351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Flow quantification using fast cine phase-contrast MR imaging, conventional cine phase-contrast MR imaging, and Doppler sonography: in vitro and in vivo validation.
    Lee VS; Spritzer CE; Carroll BA; Pool LG; Bernstein MA; Heinle SK; MacFall JR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1125-31. PubMed ID: 9308476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound in paediatric cardiology.
    Wyse R
    Herz; 1984 Jun; 9(3):171-86. PubMed ID: 6745834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.