These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19843740)

  • 1. CT protocols for acute appendicitis: time for change.
    Paulson EK; Coursey CA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1268-71. PubMed ID: 19843740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abdominal 64-MDCT for suspected appendicitis: the use of oral and IV contrast material versus IV contrast material only.
    Anderson SW; Soto JA; Lucey BC; Ozonoff A; Jordan JD; Ratevosian J; Ulrich AS; Rathlev NK; Mitchell PM; Rebholz C; Feldman JA; Rhea JT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1282-8. PubMed ID: 19843742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis with sliding slab ray-sum interpretation of low-dose unenhanced CT and standard-dose i.v. contrast-enhanced CT scans.
    Seo H; Lee KH; Kim HJ; Kim K; Kang SB; Kim SY; Kim YH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 193(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 19542400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material.
    Jacobs JE; Birnbaum BA; Macari M; Megibow AJ; Israel G; Maki DD; Aguiar AM; Langlotz CP
    Radiology; 2001 Sep; 220(3):683-90. PubMed ID: 11526267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MDCT for suspected acute appendicitis in adults: impact of oral and IV contrast media at standard-dose and simulated low-dose techniques.
    Keyzer C; Cullus P; Tack D; De Maertelaer V; Bohy P; Gevenois PA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1272-81. PubMed ID: 19843741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
    Wijetunga R; Doust B; Bigg-Wither G
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2003 Apr; 24(2):101-6. PubMed ID: 12744503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intravenous contrast alone vs intravenous and oral contrast computed tomography for the diagnosis of appendicitis in adult ED patients.
    Kepner AM; Bacasnot JV; Stahlman BA
    Am J Emerg Med; 2012 Nov; 30(9):1765-73. PubMed ID: 22633722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neutral vs positive oral contrast in diagnosing acute appendicitis with contrast-enhanced CT: sensitivity, specificity, reader confidence and interpretation time.
    Naeger DM; Chang SD; Kolli P; Shah V; Huang W; Thoeni RF
    Br J Radiol; 2011 May; 84(1001):418-26. PubMed ID: 20959365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CT enterography: concept, technique, and interpretation.
    Tochetto S; Yaghmai V
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2009 Jan; 47(1):117-32. PubMed ID: 19195538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches.
    Bae KT
    Radiology; 2010 Jul; 256(1):32-61. PubMed ID: 20574084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Therapeutic impact of CT of the appendix in a community hospital.
    Chaudhuri TK; Fink S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Sep; 193(3):W255; author reply W256. PubMed ID: 19696269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of suspected appendicitis in children and young adults: helical CT.
    Sivit CJ; Applegate KE; Berlin SC; Myers MT; Stallion A; Dudgeon DL; Borisa VJ; Morrison SC; Weinert DM; Grisoni ER
    Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):430-3. PubMed ID: 10924565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The lack of efficacy for oral contrast in the diagnosis of appendicitis by computed tomography.
    Laituri CA; Fraser JD; Aguayo P; Fike FB; Garey CL; Sharp SW; Ostlie DJ; St Peter SD
    J Surg Res; 2011 Sep; 170(1):100-3. PubMed ID: 21470628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Suspected appendicitis in children: focused CT technique for evaluation.
    Fefferman NR; Roche KJ; Pinkney LP; Ambrosino MM; Genieser NB
    Radiology; 2001 Sep; 220(3):691-5. PubMed ID: 11526268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of body habitus and use of oral contrast on reader confidence in patients with suspected acute appendicitis using 64 MDCT.
    Anderson SW; Rhea JT; Milch HN; Ozonoff A; Lucey BC; Soto JA
    Emerg Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(6):445-53. PubMed ID: 20496094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Focused helical CT using rectal contrast material only as the preferred technique for the diagnosis of suspected acute appendicitis: a prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing three different techniques.
    Hershko DD; Awad N; Fischer D; Mahajna A; Guralnik L; Israelit SH; Krausz MM
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1223-9. PubMed ID: 17566826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CT of appendicitis in children.
    Callahan MJ; Rodriguez DP; Taylor GA
    Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):325-32. PubMed ID: 12147823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acute appendicitis: diagnostic value of nonenhanced CT with selective use of contrast in routine clinical settings.
    Tamburrini S; Brunetti A; Brown M; Sirlin C; Casola G
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Aug; 17(8):2055-61. PubMed ID: 17180324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Review of suspected acute appendicitis in adults and children using CT and colonic contrast material.
    Mullins ME; Rhea JT; Novelline RA
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2003 Apr; 24(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 12744504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computed tomography diagnosis of acute appendicitis: advantages of reviewing thin-section datasets using sliding slab average intensity projection technique.
    Lee KH; Kim YH; Hahn S; Lee KW; Kim TJ; Kang SB; Shin JH
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Jul; 41(7):579-85. PubMed ID: 16772851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.