148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19843741)
1. MDCT for suspected acute appendicitis in adults: impact of oral and IV contrast media at standard-dose and simulated low-dose techniques.
Keyzer C; Cullus P; Tack D; De Maertelaer V; Bohy P; Gevenois PA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1272-81. PubMed ID: 19843741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abdominal 64-MDCT for suspected appendicitis: the use of oral and IV contrast material versus IV contrast material only.
Anderson SW; Soto JA; Lucey BC; Ozonoff A; Jordan JD; Ratevosian J; Ulrich AS; Rathlev NK; Mitchell PM; Rebholz C; Feldman JA; Rhea JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1282-8. PubMed ID: 19843742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis with sliding slab ray-sum interpretation of low-dose unenhanced CT and standard-dose i.v. contrast-enhanced CT scans.
Seo H; Lee KH; Kim HJ; Kim K; Kang SB; Kim SY; Kim YH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 193(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 19542400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. MDCT for suspected appendicitis: effect of reconstruction section thickness on diagnostic accuracy, rate of appendiceal visualization, and reader confidence using axial images.
Johnson PT; Horton KM; Kawamoto S; Eng J; Bean MJ; Shan SJ; Fishman EK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Apr; 192(4):893-901. PubMed ID: 19304692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acute appendicitis: comparison of low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced multi-detector row CT.
Keyzer C; Tack D; de Maertelaer V; Bohy P; Gevenois PA; Van Gansbeke D
Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):164-72. PubMed ID: 15155894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of combined oral and i.v. contrast-enhanced versus single i.v. contrast-enhanced mdct for the detection of acute appendicitis.
Hekimoglu K; Yildirim UM; Karabulut E; Coskun M
JBR-BTR; 2011; 94(5):278-82. PubMed ID: 22191292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Focused helical CT using rectal contrast material only as the preferred technique for the diagnosis of suspected acute appendicitis: a prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing three different techniques.
Hershko DD; Awad N; Fischer D; Mahajna A; Guralnik L; Israelit SH; Krausz MM
Dis Colon Rectum; 2007 Aug; 50(8):1223-9. PubMed ID: 17566826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Acute appendicitis in young adults: low- versus standard-radiation-dose contrast-enhanced abdominal CT for diagnosis.
Kim SY; Lee KH; Kim K; Kim TY; Lee HS; Hwang SS; Song KJ; Kang HS; Kim YH; Rhee JE
Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):437-45. PubMed ID: 21633052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acute appendicitis: comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus nonfocused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material.
Jacobs JE; Birnbaum BA; Macari M; Megibow AJ; Israel G; Maki DD; Aguiar AM; Langlotz CP
Radiology; 2001 Sep; 220(3):683-90. PubMed ID: 11526267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of body habitus and use of oral contrast on reader confidence in patients with suspected acute appendicitis using 64 MDCT.
Anderson SW; Rhea JT; Milch HN; Ozonoff A; Lucey BC; Soto JA
Emerg Radiol; 2010 Nov; 17(6):445-53. PubMed ID: 20496094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intravenous contrast alone vs intravenous and oral contrast computed tomography for the diagnosis of appendicitis in adult ED patients.
Kepner AM; Bacasnot JV; Stahlman BA
Am J Emerg Med; 2012 Nov; 30(9):1765-73. PubMed ID: 22633722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Low-dose unenhanced multidetector CT of patients with suspected renal colic.
Tack D; Sourtzis S; Delpierre I; de Maertelaer V; Gevenois PA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Feb; 180(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 12540420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intravenous and Oral Contrast vs Intravenous Contrast Alone Computed Tomography for the Visualization of Appendix and Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Adult Emergency Department Patients.
Wadhwani A; Guo L; Saude E; Els H; Lang E; McRae A; Bhayana D
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2016 Aug; 67(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 27318889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Acute appendicitis in non-contrast spiral CT: a diagnostic luxury or benefit?].
Stacher R; Portugaller H; Preidler KW; Ruppert-Kohlmayr AJ; Anegg U; Rabl H; Spuller E; Szolar DH
Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 10464501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Positive Oral Contrast Solution at MDCT for Suspected Acute Appendicitis in Adults: Rate of Appendiceal Luminal Filling of Normal and Inflamed Appendixes.
Tang SJ; Pickhardt PJ; Kim DU; Pooler BD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Nov; 213(5):W211-W217. PubMed ID: 31483140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The value of contrast-enhanced helical CT scan with rectal contrast enema in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
Naffaa LN; Ishak GE; Haddad MC
Clin Imaging; 2005; 29(4):255-8. PubMed ID: 15967316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Diagnostic assessment of painless microhematuria: prospective study comparing image quality, assessibility and diagnostic certainty of multidetector-row CT and intravenous pyelography within a single examination].
Michael M; John H; Wildermuth S; Ruedi C; Marincek B; Boehm T
Rofo; 2005 Oct; 177(10):1436-46. PubMed ID: 16170715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rapid CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis with IV contrast material.
Mun S; Ernst RD; Chen K; Oto A; Shah S; Mileski WJ
Emerg Radiol; 2006 Mar; 12(3):99-102. PubMed ID: 16362812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of graded compression ultrasonography and unenhanced spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
Gamanagatti S; Vashisht S; Kapoor A; Chumber S; Bal S
Singapore Med J; 2007 Jan; 48(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 17245521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MDCT of acute appendicitis: value of coronal reformations.
Neville AM; Paulson EK
Abdom Imaging; 2009; 34(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18493813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
