428 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19843744)
1. CT colonography predictably overestimates colonic length and distance to polyps compared with optical colonoscopy.
Duncan JE; McNally MP; Sweeney WB; Gentry AB; Barlow DS; Jensen DW; Cash BD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1291-5. PubMed ID: 19843744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Normalized distance along the colon centerline: a method for correlating polyp location on CT colonography and optical colonoscopy.
Summers RM; Swift JA; Dwyer AJ; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1296-304. PubMed ID: 19843745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated measurement of colorectal polyp height at CT colonography: hyperplastic polyps are flatter than adenomatous polyps.
Summers RM; Liu J; Yao J; Brown L; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1305-10. PubMed ID: 19843746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective blinded comparison of polyp size on computed tomography colonography and endoscopic colonoscopy.
Barancin C; Pickhardt PJ; Kim DH; Spier B; Lindstrom M; Reichelderfer M; Gopal D; Pfau P
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 May; 9(5):443-5. PubMed ID: 21277389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Polyps: linear and volumetric measurement at CT colonography.
Yeshwant SC; Summers RM; Yao J; Brickman DS; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):802-11. PubMed ID: 17114627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography after incomplete colonoscopy. Application of artificial intelligence algorithms to identify complete colonic investigations.
Deding U; Herp J; Havshoei AL; Kobaek-Larsen M; Buijs MM; Nadimi ES; Baatrup G
United European Gastroenterol J; 2020 Aug; 8(7):782-789. PubMed ID: 32731841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of optical colonoscopy and CT colonography screening strategies in the detection and recovery of subcentimeter adenomas.
Benson M; Dureja P; Gopal D; Reichelderfer M; Pfau PR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Dec; 105(12):2578-85. PubMed ID: 20842111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of laxative-free computed tomographic colonography for detection of adenomatous polyps in asymptomatic adults: a prospective evaluation.
Zalis ME; Blake MA; Cai W; Hahn PF; Halpern EF; Kazam IG; Keroack M; Magee C; Näppi JJ; Perez-Johnston R; Saltzman JR; Vij A; Yee J; Yoshida H
Ann Intern Med; 2012 May; 156(10):692-702. PubMed ID: 22586008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sub-millisievert CT colonography: effect of knowledge-based iterative reconstruction on the detection of colonic polyps.
Kang HJ; Kim SH; Shin CI; Joo I; Ryu H; Kim SG; Im JP; Han JK
Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5258-5266. PubMed ID: 29948063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of CT colonography and optical colonoscopy evaluated using surgically resected specimens.
Kawamura YJ; Okada S; Sasaki J; Tajima N; Tanaka O; Konishi F
Abdom Imaging; 2010 Oct; 35(5):584-8. PubMed ID: 19588188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Colorectal Polyps Missed with Optical Colonoscopy Despite Previous Detection and Localization with CT Colonography.
Pooler BD; Kim DH; Weiss JM; Matkowskyj KA; Pickhardt PJ
Radiology; 2016 Feb; 278(2):422-9. PubMed ID: 26280354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia.
Kim DH; Pickhardt PJ; Taylor AJ; Leung WK; Winter TC; Hinshaw JL; Gopal DV; Reichelderfer M; Hsu RH; Pfau PR
N Engl J Med; 2007 Oct; 357(14):1403-12. PubMed ID: 17914041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Polyp measurement reliability, accuracy, and discrepancy: optical colonoscopy versus CT colonography with pig colonic specimens.
Park SH; Choi EK; Lee SS; Byeon JS; Jo JY; Kim YH; Lee KH; Ha HK; Han JK
Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 17507724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Manual and automated polyp measurement comparison of CT colonography with optical colonoscopy.
Jeong JY; Kim MJ; Kim SS
Acad Radiol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):231-9. PubMed ID: 18206622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of polyp distance on CT colonography between supine and prone scans using an automated path-distance measurement tool: correlation with colonoscopy.
Park HS; Kim SH; Lee JM; Lee JY; Kim SG; Han JK; Choi BI
Abdom Imaging; 2010 Feb; 35(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 19089490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of optical colonoscopy and CT colonography for polyp detection.
Dachman AH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1289-90. PubMed ID: 19843743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. CT colonography polyp matching: differences between experienced readers.
Liedenbaum MH; de Vries AH; Halligan S; Bossuyt PM; Dachman AH; Dekker E; Florie J; Gryspeerdt SS; Jensch S; Johnson CD; Laghi A; Taylor SA; Stoker J
Eur Radiol; 2009 Jul; 19(7):1723-30. PubMed ID: 19224220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A straightforward approach to computer-aided polyp detection using a polyp-specific volumetric feature in CT colonography.
Lee JG; Hyo Kim J; Hyung Kim S; Sun Park H; Ihn Choi B
Comput Biol Med; 2011 Sep; 41(9):790-801. PubMed ID: 21762887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Polyp measurement with CT colonography: multiple-reader, multiple-workstation comparison.
Young BM; Fletcher JG; Paulsen SR; Booya F; Johnson CD; Johnson KT; Melton Z; Rodysill D; Mandrekar J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 17179354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-aided polyp detection on CT colonography: comparison of three systems in a high-risk human population.
Park HS; Kim SH; Kim JH; Lee JG; Kim SG; Lee JM; Lee JY; Han JK; Choi BI
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 75(2):e147-57. PubMed ID: 20430559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
