195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19843745)
1. Normalized distance along the colon centerline: a method for correlating polyp location on CT colonography and optical colonoscopy.
Summers RM; Swift JA; Dwyer AJ; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1296-304. PubMed ID: 19843745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CT colonography predictably overestimates colonic length and distance to polyps compared with optical colonoscopy.
Duncan JE; McNally MP; Sweeney WB; Gentry AB; Barlow DS; Jensen DW; Cash BD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1291-5. PubMed ID: 19843744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting polyp location on optical colonoscopy from CT colonography by minimal-energy curve modeling of the colonoscope path.
Liu J; Chang KW; Yao J; Summers RM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Dec; 59(12):3531-40. PubMed ID: 23033425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography after incomplete colonoscopy. Application of artificial intelligence algorithms to identify complete colonic investigations.
Deding U; Herp J; Havshoei AL; Kobaek-Larsen M; Buijs MM; Nadimi ES; Baatrup G
United European Gastroenterol J; 2020 Aug; 8(7):782-789. PubMed ID: 32731841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated centerline for computed tomography colonography.
Iordanescu G; Summers RM
Acad Radiol; 2003 Nov; 10(11):1291-301. PubMed ID: 14626304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated measurement of colorectal polyp height at CT colonography: hyperplastic polyps are flatter than adenomatous polyps.
Summers RM; Liu J; Yao J; Brown L; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Nov; 193(5):1305-10. PubMed ID: 19843746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Polyps: linear and volumetric measurement at CT colonography.
Yeshwant SC; Summers RM; Yao J; Brickman DS; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):802-11. PubMed ID: 17114627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of polyp distance on CT colonography between supine and prone scans using an automated path-distance measurement tool: correlation with colonoscopy.
Park HS; Kim SH; Lee JM; Lee JY; Kim SG; Han JK; Choi BI
Abdom Imaging; 2010 Feb; 35(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 19089490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of laxative-free computed tomographic colonography for detection of adenomatous polyps in asymptomatic adults: a prospective evaluation.
Zalis ME; Blake MA; Cai W; Hahn PF; Halpern EF; Kazam IG; Keroack M; Magee C; Näppi JJ; Perez-Johnston R; Saltzman JR; Vij A; Yee J; Yoshida H
Ann Intern Med; 2012 May; 156(10):692-702. PubMed ID: 22586008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Registration of prone and supine CT colonography scans using correlation optimized warping and canonical correlation analysis.
Wang S; Yao J; Liu J; Petrick N; Van Uitert RL; Periaswamy S; Summers RM
Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5595-603. PubMed ID: 20095272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of CT colonography and optical colonoscopy evaluated using surgically resected specimens.
Kawamura YJ; Okada S; Sasaki J; Tajima N; Tanaka O; Konishi F
Abdom Imaging; 2010 Oct; 35(5):584-8. PubMed ID: 19588188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia.
Kim DH; Pickhardt PJ; Taylor AJ; Leung WK; Winter TC; Hinshaw JL; Gopal DV; Reichelderfer M; Hsu RH; Pfau PR
N Engl J Med; 2007 Oct; 357(14):1403-12. PubMed ID: 17914041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CT colonography polyp matching: differences between experienced readers.
Liedenbaum MH; de Vries AH; Halligan S; Bossuyt PM; Dachman AH; Dekker E; Florie J; Gryspeerdt SS; Jensch S; Johnson CD; Laghi A; Taylor SA; Stoker J
Eur Radiol; 2009 Jul; 19(7):1723-30. PubMed ID: 19224220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility of using the marginal blood vessels as reference landmarks for CT colonography.
Wei Z; Yao J; Wang S; Liu J; Dwyer AJ; Pickhardt PJ; Nowinski WL; Summers RM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jan; 202(1):W50-8. PubMed ID: 24370165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective blinded comparison of polyp size on computed tomography colonography and endoscopic colonoscopy.
Barancin C; Pickhardt PJ; Kim DH; Spier B; Lindstrom M; Reichelderfer M; Gopal D; Pfau P
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 May; 9(5):443-5. PubMed ID: 21277389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of optical colonoscopy and CT colonography screening strategies in the detection and recovery of subcentimeter adenomas.
Benson M; Dureja P; Gopal D; Reichelderfer M; Pfau PR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Dec; 105(12):2578-85. PubMed ID: 20842111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population.
Graser A; Stieber P; Nagel D; Schäfer C; Horst D; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Lottes A; Geisbüsch S; Kramer H; Wagner AC; Diepolder H; Schirra J; Roth HJ; Seidel D; Göke B; Reiser MF; Kolligs FT
Gut; 2009 Feb; 58(2):241-8. PubMed ID: 18852257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Colorectal Polyps Missed with Optical Colonoscopy Despite Previous Detection and Localization with CT Colonography.
Pooler BD; Kim DH; Weiss JM; Matkowskyj KA; Pickhardt PJ
Radiology; 2016 Feb; 278(2):422-9. PubMed ID: 26280354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sub-millisievert CT colonography: effect of knowledge-based iterative reconstruction on the detection of colonic polyps.
Kang HJ; Kim SH; Shin CI; Joo I; Ryu H; Kim SG; Im JP; Han JK
Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5258-5266. PubMed ID: 29948063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computed Tomography Colonography vs Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Surveillance After Surgery.
Weinberg DS; Pickhardt PJ; Bruining DH; Edwards K; Fletcher JG; Gollub MJ; Keenan EM; Kupfer SS; Li T; Lubner SJ; Markowitz AJ; Ross EA
Gastroenterology; 2018 Mar; 154(4):927-934.e4. PubMed ID: 29174927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
