749 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19845198)
1. Boldt v. Boldt: A pediatric ethics perspective.
Diekema DS
J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 19845198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Where is the child? Circumcision and custody in Boldt v. Boldt.
Dolgin JL
J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 19845197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Boldt v. Boldt.
Davis DS
J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 19845196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Male circumcision.
American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision
Pediatrics; 2012 Sep; 130(3):e756-85. PubMed ID: 22926175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Where is the voice of the man the child will become?
Geisheker JV
J Clin Ethics; 2010; 21(1):86-8. PubMed ID: 20465080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision.
Mazor J
J Med Ethics; 2013 Jul; 39(7):421-8. PubMed ID: 23698892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.
Schor EL;
Pediatrics; 2003 Jun; 111(6 Pt 2):1541-71. PubMed ID: 12777595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Between prophylaxis and child abuse: the ethics of neonatal male circumcision.
Benatar M; Benatar D
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(2):35-48. PubMed ID: 12859815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic testing of children for adult-onset diseases: is testing in the child's best interests?
Pelias MK
Mt Sinai J Med; 2006 May; 73(3):605-8. PubMed ID: 16758098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
Sayeed SA
Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethical problems in pediatric critical care: consent.
Zawistowski CA; Frader JE
Crit Care Med; 2003 May; 31(5 Suppl):S407-10. PubMed ID: 12771592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Committee on Bioethics, American Academy of Pediatrics.
Pediatrics; 1995 Feb; 95(2):314-7. PubMed ID: 7838658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Consent requirements for treatment of minors.
Thompson HA
Tex Med; 1989 Aug; 85(8):56-9. PubMed ID: 2763219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do parents have the legal authority to consent to the surgical amputation of normal, healthy tissue from their infant children?: the practice of circumcision in the United States.
Povenmire R
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1998-1999; 7(1):87-123. PubMed ID: 16526136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Circumcision policy statement. American Academy of Pediatrics. Task Force on Circumcision.
Pediatrics; 1999 Mar; 103(3):686-93. PubMed ID: 10049981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Parental role in medical decision-making: fact or fiction? A comparative study of ethical dilemmas in French and American neonatal intensive care units.
Orfali K
Soc Sci Med; 2004 May; 58(10):2009-22. PubMed ID: 15020016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of pediatric advance directives: a tool for palliative care physicians.
Zinner SE
Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2008 Dec-2009 Jan; 25(6):427-30. PubMed ID: 18812617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Teenage abortion in Germany: with reference to the legal system in the United States.
Belling DW; Eberl C
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1996; 12(2):475-502. PubMed ID: 8666732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using bioethics discourse to determine when parents should make health care decisions for their children: is deference justified?
Rosato JL
Temple Law Rev; 2000; 73(1):1-68. PubMed ID: 12449931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
