676 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19845208)
1. APPROVED: an extension for extension surveys.
Joint Commission
Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 May; 29(5):8. PubMed ID: 19845208
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An assessment of accreditation with contingencies and the three-year award cycle.
Ente BH
QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1985 Mar; 11(3):93-6. PubMed ID: 3921895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Changes in content, format, and posting of the accreditation survey findings report.
Joint Commission
Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 Oct; 29(10):12-3. PubMed ID: 19891193
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Revisions to the Public Information Policy.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Sep; 25(9):7, 9. PubMed ID: 16515349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Change in the process for organizations in which their survey reports meet a rule for conditional accreditation or preliminary denial of accreditation decision.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):7. PubMed ID: 15484653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. APPROVED: Decision rule for a preliminary denial of accreditation eliminated.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 Dec; 29(12):4. PubMed ID: 20698087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. APPROVED: New preliminary denial of accreditation process.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 Dec; 29(12):7. PubMed ID: 20698090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Approved: elimination of one-year follow-up survey for certain organizations new to the accreditation/certification process.
Joint Commission
Jt Comm Perspect; 2008 Dec; 28(12):10. PubMed ID: 19186445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. OIG report spurs JCAHO changes in accreditation surveys, oversight.
Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Sep; 24(9):133-5. PubMed ID: 10558178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Joint Commission to offer accreditation services in other countries.
Jt Comm Perspect; 1996; 16(4):5. PubMed ID: 10164931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Accreditation Committee keeps tabs on important accreditation issues.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2002 Dec; 22(12):8-9. PubMed ID: 12506452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Random unannounced surveys in 2001.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 Jan; 21(1):5. PubMed ID: 11215070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Updated timeline charts triennial accreditation process.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Apr; 24(4):1, 3. PubMed ID: 15085692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Joint Commission expands access to e-App.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2010 May; 30(5):1, 4. PubMed ID: 20540404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. APPROVED: 2013 accreditation and certification decision rules.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations
Jt Comm Perspect; 2012 Sep; 32(9):1, 9. PubMed ID: 23061248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Standards, policy, and survey eligibility changes for 2001.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2000; 20(6):7. PubMed ID: 11142238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Should you consider ISO 9000?
Hosp Peer Rev; 1998 Jan; 23(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10175807
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The launch of Shared Visions-New Pathways.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 14746090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Fine tuning the tailored survey policy.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 May; 21(5):8-9. PubMed ID: 11383203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Updating PPO accreditation.
Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 Mar; 21(3):4. PubMed ID: 11270204
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
