40 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19845980)
1. Costs and effects of using specialized breast technologists in prereading mammograms in a clinical patient population.
van den Biggelaar FJ; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Flobbe K
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):505-13. PubMed ID: 19845980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic performance of breast technologists in reading mammograms in a clinical patient population.
van den Biggelaar FJ; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Flobbe K
Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Mar; 64(4):442-50. PubMed ID: 20456190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Strategies for digital mammography interpretation in a clinical patient population.
van den Biggelaar FJ; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Flobbe K
Int J Cancer; 2009 Dec; 125(12):2923-9. PubMed ID: 19672861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The cost effectiveness of 5 interventions to increase mammography adherence in a managed care population.
Saywell RM; Champion VL; Zollinger TW; Maraj M; Skinner CS; Zoppi KA; Muegge CM
Am J Manag Care; 2003 Jan; 9(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 12549813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is cost a barrier to screening mammography for low-income women receiving Medicare benefits? A randomized trial.
Kiefe CI; McKay SV; Halevy A; Brody BA
Arch Intern Med; 1994 Jun; 154(11):1217-24. PubMed ID: 8203989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample.
Beam CA; Layde PM; Sullivan DC
Arch Intern Med; 1996 Jan; 156(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 8546556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A workplace breast cancer screening program. Costs and components.
Schrammel P; Griffiths RI; Griffiths CB
AAOHN J; 1998 Nov; 46(11):523-9. PubMed ID: 9934000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Added Value of Prereading Screening Mammograms for Breast Cancer by Radiologic Technologists on Early Screening Outcomes.
Geertse TD; Setz-Pels W; van der Waal D; Nederend J; Korte B; Tetteroo E; Pijnappel RM; Broeders MJM; Duijm LEM
Radiology; 2022 Feb; 302(2):276-283. PubMed ID: 34751612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A model-based comparison of breast cancer screening strategies: mammograms and clinical breast examinations.
Shen Y; Parmigiani G
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Feb; 14(2):529-32. PubMed ID: 15734983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prescreening mammography by technologists: a preliminary assessment.
Sumkin JH; Klaman HM; Graham M; Ruskauff T; Gennari RC; King JL; Klym AH; Ganott MA; Gur D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jan; 180(1):253-6. PubMed ID: 12490515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Technologists' Characteristics and Quality of Positioning in Daily Practice in a Canadian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
Guertin MH; Théberge I; Zomahoun HT; Dufresne MP; Pelletier É; Brisson J
Acad Radiol; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1359-1366. PubMed ID: 27567127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Normal mammograms and the practice of obtaining previous mammograms: usefulness and costs.
Wilson TE; Nijhawan VK; Helvie MA
Radiology; 1996 Mar; 198(3):661-3. PubMed ID: 8628851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Economic challenges in breast imaging. A survivor's guide to success.
Feig SA
Radiol Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 38(4):843-52. PubMed ID: 10943281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of immediate reading of screening mammograms on medical care utilization and costs after false-positive mammograms.
Stewart KA; Neumann PJ; Fletcher SW; Barton MB
Health Serv Res; 2007 Aug; 42(4):1464-82. PubMed ID: 17610433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterizing the Mammography Technologist Workforce in North Carolina.
Henderson LM; Marsh MW; Benefield T; Pearsall E; Durham D; Schroeder BF; Bowling JM; Viglione CA; Yankaskas BC
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Dec; 12(12 Pt B):1419-26. PubMed ID: 26614888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of a program to train radiologic technologists to identify abnormalities on mammograms.
Bassett LW; Hollatz-Brown AJ; Bastani R; Pearce JG; Hirji K; Chen L
Radiology; 1995 Jan; 194(1):189-92. PubMed ID: 7997550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficiency and cost saving of 7 day per week exercise testing utilizing all electrocardiography technologists.
Smith G; Mooney D; Davey L; Nebo L; Irwin ME; Senaratne MP
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2001 Jan; 6(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 11174860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pre-reading mammograms by specialised breast technologists: legal implications for technologist and radiologist in The Netherlands.
van den Biggelaar FJ; Flobbe K; van Engelshoven JM; de Bijl NP
Eur J Health Law; 2009 Sep; 16(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 19788004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The breast imaging center. Successful management in today's environment.
Logan-Young W
Radiol Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 38(4):853-60. PubMed ID: 10943282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
