40 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19845980)
21. [Questionnaire survey on teleradiology for radiological technologists: analyses by age group and facility type in Hokkaido].
Ogasawara K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Sep; 59(9):1147-54. PubMed ID: 14593328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Inhalation therapy anesthesia technologists.
Keszler H; Bessette M
Can Anaesth Soc J; 1977 May; 24(3):417. PubMed ID: 871946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Epithelial cell dissemination and readhesion: analysis of factors contributing to metastasis formation in breast cancer.
Hekimian K; Meisezahl S; Trompelt K; Rabenstein C; Pachmann K
ISRN Oncol; 2012; 2012():601810. PubMed ID: 22530147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. CONFERENCE OF THE INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS.
Science; 1944 Feb; 99(2564):140-1. PubMed ID: 17811170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. THE INSTITUTE OF FOOD TECHNOLOGISTS.
Science; 1940 Mar; 91(2361):309-10. PubMed ID: 17777224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluating task shifting to the clinical technologist in Dutch healthcare: A mixed methods study.
de Haan M; van Eijk-Hustings Y; Bessems-Beks M; De Bruijn-Geraets D; Dirksen C; Vrijhoef H
PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0281053. PubMed ID: 36857391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Conspicuity of bone metastases on fast Dixon-based multisequence whole-body MRI: clinical utility per sequence.
Costelloe CM; Madewell JE; Kundra V; Harrell RK; Bassett RL; Ma J
Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jun; 31(5):669-75. PubMed ID: 23290478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnostic performance of breast technologists in reading mammograms in a clinical patient population.
van den Biggelaar FJ; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Flobbe K
Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Mar; 64(4):442-50. PubMed ID: 20456190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Strategies for digital mammography interpretation in a clinical patient population.
van den Biggelaar FJ; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Flobbe K
Int J Cancer; 2009 Dec; 125(12):2923-9. PubMed ID: 19672861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The cost effectiveness of 5 interventions to increase mammography adherence in a managed care population.
Saywell RM; Champion VL; Zollinger TW; Maraj M; Skinner CS; Zoppi KA; Muegge CM
Am J Manag Care; 2003 Jan; 9(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 12549813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Is cost a barrier to screening mammography for low-income women receiving Medicare benefits? A randomized trial.
Kiefe CI; McKay SV; Halevy A; Brody BA
Arch Intern Med; 1994 Jun; 154(11):1217-24. PubMed ID: 8203989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample.
Beam CA; Layde PM; Sullivan DC
Arch Intern Med; 1996 Jan; 156(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 8546556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Costs and effects of using specialized breast technologists in prereading mammograms in a clinical patient population.
van den Biggelaar FJ; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Flobbe K
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):505-13. PubMed ID: 19845980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [New Search]
