These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19845981)

  • 1. Developing medical device technologies from users' perspectives: a theoretical framework for involving users in the development process.
    Shah SG; Robinson I; AlShawi S
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):514-21. PubMed ID: 19845981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation.
    Shah SG; Robinson I
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2007; 23(1):131-7. PubMed ID: 17234027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. User involvement in healthcare technology development and assessment: structured literature review.
    Shah SG; Robinson I
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv; 2006; 19(6-7):500-15. PubMed ID: 17100220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Consumer-Focused Health Information Technology Systems Through eHealth Literacy: A Framework for Understanding Users' Needs.
    Kayser L; Kushniruk A; Osborne RH; Norgaard O; Turner P
    JMIR Hum Factors; 2015 May; 2(1):e9. PubMed ID: 27025228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design and evaluation of a prototype of augmented reality applied to medical devices.
    Escalada-Hernández P; Soto Ruiz N; San Martín-Rodríguez L
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Aug; 128():87-92. PubMed ID: 31126843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. From users involvement to users' needs understanding: a case study.
    Niès J; Pelayo S
    Int J Med Inform; 2010 Apr; 79(4):e76-82. PubMed ID: 19660983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: medical device manufacturers' perspectives.
    Money AG; Barnett J; Kuljis J; Craven MP; Martin JL; Young T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2011 Feb; 11():15. PubMed ID: 21356097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. User participation in healthcare IT development: a developers' viewpoint in Finland.
    Martikainen S; Korpela M; Tiihonen T
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Mar; 83(3):189-200. PubMed ID: 24382475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The representation of healthcare end users' perspectives by surrogates in healthcare decisions: a literature review.
    Shah SG; Farrow A; Robinson I
    Scand J Caring Sci; 2009 Dec; 23(4):809-19. PubMed ID: 19740114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. User-centred health design: reflections on D4D's experiences and challenges.
    Moody L
    J Med Eng Technol; 2014; 39(7):395-403. PubMed ID: 26453037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. First steps in designing an all-in-one ICT-based device for persons with cognitive impairment: evaluation of the first mock-up.
    Boman IL; Persson AC; Bartfai A
    BMC Geriatr; 2016 Mar; 16():61. PubMed ID: 26951709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A user-centred approach to requirements elicitation in medical device development: a case study from an industry perspective.
    Martin JL; Clark DJ; Morgan SP; Crowe JA; Murphy E
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jan; 43(1):184-90. PubMed ID: 21636072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human factors in the design of medical devices - Approaches to meeting international standards in the European Union and USA.
    Privitera MB; Evans M; Southee D
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Mar; 59(Pt A):251-263. PubMed ID: 27890135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health and medical device development for fundamental care: Scoping review.
    Matinolli HM; Mieronkoski R; Salanterä S
    J Clin Nurs; 2020 Jun; 29(11-12):1822-1831. PubMed ID: 31512288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Design and implementation of a portal for the medical equipment market: MEDICOM.
    Palamas S; Kalivas D; Panou-Diamandi O; Zeelenberg C; van Nimwegen C
    J Med Internet Res; 2001; 3(4):E32. PubMed ID: 11772547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. User participation in community mental health services: exploring the experiences of users and professionals.
    Elstad TA; Eide AH
    Scand J Caring Sci; 2009 Dec; 23(4):674-81. PubMed ID: 19804372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Usability of a wearable fall detection prototype from the perspective of older people-A real field testing approach.
    Thilo FJS; Hahn S; Halfens RJG; Schols JMGA
    J Clin Nurs; 2019 Jan; 28(1-2):310-320. PubMed ID: 29964344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health technology assessment from a Canadian device industry perspective.
    Ferrusi IL; Ames D; Lim ME; Goeree R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 May; 6(5):353-9. PubMed ID: 19394576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A five-layer users' need hierarchy of computer input device selection: a contextual observation survey of computer users with cervical spinal injuries (CSI).
    Tsai TH; Nash RJ; Tseng KC
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2009 May; 4(3):158-80. PubMed ID: 19378211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Safe Medical Devices Act: management guidance for hospital compliance with the new FDA requirements.
    Alder HC
    Hosp Technol Ser; 1993 Oct; 12(11):1-27. PubMed ID: 10129209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.