110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19846384)
21. A computer-aided detection of the architectural distortion in digital mammograms using the fractal dimension measurements of BEMD.
Zyout I; Togneri R
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2018 Dec; 70():173-184. PubMed ID: 29691123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pectoral muscle identification in mammograms.
Camilus KS; Govindan VK; Sathidevi PS
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 12(3):3285. PubMed ID: 21844845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Robust Automatic Pectoral Muscle Segmentation from Mammograms Using Texture Gradient and Euclidean Distance Regression.
Bora VB; Kothari AG; Keskar AG
J Digit Imaging; 2016 Feb; 29(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 26259521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A fuzzy rule-based approach for characterization of mammogram masses into BI-RADS shape categories.
Vadivel A; Surendiran B
Comput Biol Med; 2013 May; 43(4):259-67. PubMed ID: 23414779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Accurate segmentation of the breast region from digitized mammograms.
Ojala T; Näppi J; Nevalainen O
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2001; 25(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 11120407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. MRT letter: segmentation and texture-based classification of breast mammogram images.
Naveed N; Jaffar MA; Choi TS
Microsc Res Tech; 2011 Nov; 74(11):985-7. PubMed ID: 21898670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Automatic segmentation of the pectoral muscle based on boundary identification and shape prediction.
Guo Y; Zhao W; Li S; Zhang Y; Lu Y
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Feb; 65(4):045016. PubMed ID: 31869824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Mass segmentation in mammograms by using Bidimensional Emperical Mode Decomposition BEMD.
Jai-Andaloussi S; Sekkaki A; Quellec G; Lamard M; Cazuguel G; Roux C
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():5441-4. PubMed ID: 24110967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Multilevel learning-based segmentation of ill-defined and spiculated masses in mammograms.
Tao Y; Lo SC; Freedman MT; Makariou E; Xuan J
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5993-6002. PubMed ID: 21158311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Removal of pectoral muscle based on topographic map and shape-shifting silhouette.
Mughal B; Muhammad N; Sharif M; Rehman A; Saba T
BMC Cancer; 2018 Aug; 18(1):778. PubMed ID: 30068304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Study of mass segmentation algorithm for digital mammograms].
Chen L; Zhang K; Jin Z
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 25(6):1282-4. PubMed ID: 19166192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Pectoral muscle detection in mammograms using local statistical features.
Liu L; Liu Q; Lu W
J Digit Imaging; 2014 Oct; 27(5):633-41. PubMed ID: 24482043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pectoral muscle removal in mammogram images: A novel approach for improved accuracy and efficiency.
Chen S; Bennett DL; Colditz GA; Jiang S
Cancer Causes Control; 2024 Jan; 35(1):185-191. PubMed ID: 37676616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Single and multiscale detection of masses in digital mammograms.
te Brake GM; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Jul; 18(7):628-39. PubMed ID: 10504096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Spectral phase based medical image processing.
Kothapalli SR; Yelleswarapu CS; Naraharisetty SG; Wu P; Rao DV
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jun; 12(6):708-21. PubMed ID: 15935969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Breast tissue segmentation from x-ray radiographs.
Chen C; Nielsen M; Karssemeijer N; Brandt SS
Phys Med Biol; 2014 May; 59(10):2445-56. PubMed ID: 24778348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram using multiscale curvelet transform.
Eltoukhy MM; Faye I; Samir BB
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2010 Jun; 34(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 20004076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. ATMTN: a telemammography network architecture.
Sheybani EO; Sankar R
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Dec; 49(12):1438-43. PubMed ID: 12542239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Unsupervised feature selection in digital mammogram image using rough set theory.
Thangavel K; Velayutham C
Int J Bioinform Res Appl; 2012; 8(5-6):436-54. PubMed ID: 23060420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mammogram retrieval on similar mass lesions.
Wei CH; Chen SY; Liu X
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Jun; 106(3):234-48. PubMed ID: 20933295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
