BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19846655)

  • 1. Determination of Echinocandin MICs for Candida species in less than 8 hours: comparison of the rapid susceptibility assay with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute's broth microdilution assay.
    Hazen KC; Dirks D; Masuoka J
    J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Dec; 47(12):4043-8. PubMed ID: 19846655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Susceptibility to echinocandins of Candida spp. strains isolated in Italy assessed by European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution methods.
    Montagna MT; Lovero G; Coretti C; Martinelli D; De Giglio O; Iatta R; Balbino S; Rosato A; Caggiano G
    BMC Microbiol; 2015 May; 15():106. PubMed ID: 25990252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and Etest methods with the CLSI broth microdilution method for echinocandin susceptibility testing of Candida species.
    Pfaller MA; Castanheira M; Diekema DJ; Messer SA; Moet GJ; Jones RN
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 May; 48(5):1592-9. PubMed ID: 20335424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of anidulafungin MICs determined by the clinical and laboratory standards institute broth microdilution method (M27-A3 document) and Etest for Candida species isolates.
    Espinel-Ingroff A; Canton E; Peman J; Martín-Mazuelo E
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2010 Mar; 54(3):1347-50. PubMed ID: 20028814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wild-type MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for the echinocandins and Candida spp.
    Pfaller MA; Boyken L; Hollis RJ; Kroeger J; Messer SA; Tendolkar S; Jones RN; Turnidge J; Diekema DJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 48(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 19923478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Echinocandin susceptibility testing of Candida species: comparison of EUCAST EDef 7.1, CLSI M27-A3, Etest, disk diffusion, and agar dilution methods with RPMI and isosensitest media.
    Arendrup MC; Garcia-Effron G; Lass-Flörl C; Lopez AG; Rodriguez-Tudela JL; Cuenca-Estrella M; Perlin DS
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2010 Jan; 54(1):426-39. PubMed ID: 19884370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Real-world experience with echinocandin MICs against Candida species in a multicenter study of hospitals that routinely perform susceptibility testing of bloodstream isolates.
    Eschenauer GA; Nguyen MH; Shoham S; Vazquez JA; Morris AJ; Pasculle WA; Kubin CJ; Klinker KP; Carver PL; Hanson KE; Chen S; Lam SW; Potoski BA; Clarke LG; Shields RK; Clancy CJ
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2014; 58(4):1897-906. PubMed ID: 24395235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of the Sensititre YeastOne colorimetric antifungal panel for antifungal susceptibility testing of the echinocandins anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin.
    Pfaller MA; Chaturvedi V; Diekema DJ; Ghannoum MA; Holliday NM; Killian SB; Knapp CC; Messer SA; Miskov A; Ramani R
    J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Jul; 46(7):2155-9. PubMed ID: 18463213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multicenter study of anidulafungin and micafungin MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for eight Candida species and the CLSI M27-A3 broth microdilution method.
    Pfaller MA; Espinel-Ingroff A; Bustamante B; Canton E; Diekema DJ; Fothergill A; Fuller J; Gonzalez GM; Guarro J; Lass-Flörl C; Lockhart SR; Martin-Mazuelos E; Meis JF; Ostrosky-Zeichner L; Pelaez T; St-Germain G; Turnidge J
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2014; 58(2):916-22. PubMed ID: 24277027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro susceptibility of invasive isolates of Candida spp. to anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin: six years of global surveillance.
    Pfaller MA; Boyken L; Hollis RJ; Kroeger J; Messer SA; Tendolkar S; Diekema DJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Jan; 46(1):150-6. PubMed ID: 18032613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Echinocandin susceptibility testing of Candida spp. Using EUCAST EDef 7.1 and CLSI M27-A3 standard procedures: analysis of the influence of bovine serum albumin supplementation, storage time, and drug lots.
    Arendrup MC; Rodriguez-Tudela JL; Park S; Garcia-Effron G; Delmas G; Cuenca-Estrella M; Gomez-Lopez A; Perlin DS
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2011 Apr; 55(4):1580-7. PubMed ID: 21245440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the Etest and a rapid flow cytometry-based method with the reference CLSI broth microdilution protocol M27-A3 for the echinocandin susceptibility testing of Candida spp.
    Vale-Silva LA; Pinto P; Lopes V; Ramos H; Pinto E
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2012 Jun; 31(6):941-6. PubMed ID: 21909651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of micafungin MICs as determined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution method (M27-A3 document) and Etest for Candida spp. isolates.
    Espinel-Ingroff A; Cantón E; Pelaez T; Pemán J
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2011 May; 70(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 21513843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the Sensititre Yeast One microdilution method for susceptibility testing of Candida species to anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin.
    García-Agudo L; García-Martos P; Martos-Cañadas J; Aznar-Marín P; Marín-Casanova P; Rodríguez-Iglesias M
    Rev Esp Quimioter; 2012 Dec; 25(4):256-60. PubMed ID: 23303256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Species-specific and drug-specific differences in susceptibility of Candida biofilms to echinocandins: characterization of less common bloodstream isolates.
    Simitsopoulou M; Peshkova P; Tasina E; Katragkou A; Kyrpitzi D; Velegraki A; Walsh TJ; Roilides E
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2013 Jun; 57(6):2562-70. PubMed ID: 23529739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Paradoxical growth effects of the echinocandins caspofungin and micafungin, but not of anidulafungin, on clinical isolates of Candida albicans and C. dubliniensis.
    Fleischhacker M; Radecke C; Schulz B; Ruhnke M
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2008 Feb; 27(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 18057972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Etest and Sensititre YeastOne Susceptibility Testing of Echinocandins against Candida Species from a Single Center in Austria.
    Aigner M; Erbeznik T; Gschwentner M; Lass-Flörl C
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2017 Aug; 61(8):. PubMed ID: 28559257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk factors of mortality and comparative in-vitro efficacy of anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin for candidemia.
    Lee SC; Lee CW; Shih HJ; Huang SH; Chiou MJ; See LC
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2014 Jun; 47(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 24246191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vivo comparison of the pharmacodynamic targets for echinocandin drugs against Candida species.
    Andes D; Diekema DJ; Pfaller MA; Bohrmuller J; Marchillo K; Lepak A
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2010 Jun; 54(6):2497-506. PubMed ID: 20385855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved detection of Candida sp. fks hot spot mutants by using the method of the CLSI M27-A3 document with the addition of bovine serum albumin.
    Garcia-Effron G; Park S; Perlin DS
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2011 May; 55(5):2245-55. PubMed ID: 21383097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.