770 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1984702)
1. A prospective comparison of four insanity defense standards.
Wettstein RM; Mulvey EP; Rogers R
Am J Psychiatry; 1991 Jan; 148(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 1984702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The insanity defence: from wild beasts to M'Naghten.
Allnutt S; Samuels A; O'driscoll C
Australas Psychiatry; 2007 Aug; 15(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 17612881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Insanity defenses: contested or conceded?
Rogers JL; Bloom JD; Manson SM
Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Jul; 141(7):885-8. PubMed ID: 6731639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
Giorgi-Guarnieri D; Janofsky J; Keram E; Lawsky S; Merideth P; Mossman D; Schwart-Watts D; Scott C; Thompson J; Zonana H;
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The insanity defense: effects of abolition unsupported by a moral consensus.
Cobun LS
Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):471-500. PubMed ID: 6486122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mental health criminal defenses in persons with neuropsychiatric disorders.
Frierson RL; Joshi KG
Behav Sci Law; 2024; 42(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 37966983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The psychiatrist's guide to right and wrong: judicial standards of wrongfulness since M'Naghten.
Goldstein RL; Rotter M
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 3069146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. AAPL Practice Guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense.
American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (AAPL)
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2014; 42(4 Suppl):S3-S76. PubMed ID: 25492121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of criminal responsibility: initial validation of the R-CRAS with the M'Naghten and GBMI standards.
Rogers R; Seman W; Clark CR
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1986; 9(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 3793347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Elimination of the exculpatory insanity rule. A modern societal need.
Halpern AL
Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1983 Dec; 6(4):611-27. PubMed ID: 6364069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Translating clinical findings to the legal norm: the Defendant's Insanity Assessment Support Scale (DIASS).
Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Meynen G; Carabellese F; Ferracuti S
Transl Psychiatry; 2019 Nov; 9(1):278. PubMed ID: 31699969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. United States v. Lyons: toward a new conception of legal insanity.
Mossman D
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 3365479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two year's experience under Utah's mens rea insanity law.
Heinbecker P
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1986; 14(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 3730630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Opinions concerning the insanity plea and criminality among mental patients.
Pasewark RA; Seidenzahl D
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1979; 7(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 540170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The detection of malingering in criminal forensic groups: MMPI validity scales.
Wasyliw OE; Grossman LS; Haywood TW; Cavanaugh JL
J Pers Assess; 1988; 52(2):321-33. PubMed ID: 3404393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A confusion of tongues: competence, insanity, psychiatry, and the law.
Gutheil TG
Psychiatr Serv; 1999 Jun; 50(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 10375145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Insanity defense in Canada.
Arboleda-Florez J
Can Psychiatr Assoc J; 1978 Feb; 23(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 638928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Defendants pleading insanity: an analysis of outcome.
Janofsky JS; Vandewalle MB; Rappeport JR
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 2758121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Defendants are clueless--the 30-day psychiatric observation.
Kaliski SZ; Borcherds M; Williams F
S Afr Med J; 1997 Oct; 87(10):1351-5. PubMed ID: 9472247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The psychiatrist's guide to right and wrong: Part IV: The insanity defense and the Ultimate Issue Rule.
Goldstein RL
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 2790225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
