107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19847659)
1. Determinants of inequalities in cervical cancer stage at diagnosis and survival in New Zealand.
Priest P; Sadler L; Sykes P; Marshall R; Peters J; Crengle S
Cancer Causes Control; 2010 Feb; 21(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 19847659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Demographic differences in stage at diagnosis and cervical cancer survival in New Zealand, 1994-2005.
Brewer N; Pearce N; Jeffreys M; White P; Ellison-Loschmann L
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2009 Jul; 18(7):955-63. PubMed ID: 19580365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Which factors account for the ethnic inequalities in stage at diagnosis and cervical cancer survival in New Zealand?
Brewer N; Zugna D; Daniel R; Borman B; Pearce N; Richiardi L
Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Aug; 36(4):e251-7. PubMed ID: 22504054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does screening history explain the ethnic differences in stage at diagnosis of cervical cancer in New Zealand?
Brewer N; Pearce N; Jeffreys M; Borman B; Ellison-Loschmann L
Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Feb; 39(1):156-65. PubMed ID: 19808843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characteristics of ovarian cancer in women residing in Aotearoa, New Zealand: 1993-2004.
Firestone RT; Wong KC; Ellison-Loschmann L; Pearce N; Jeffreys M
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2009 Oct; 63(10):814-9. PubMed ID: 19574244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pathways to diagnosis of cervical cancer: screening history, delay in follow up, and smear reading.
Priest P; Sadler L; Peters J; Crengle S; Bethwaite P; Medley G; Jackson R
BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):398-407. PubMed ID: 17166215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigating reasons for ethnic inequalities in breast cancer survival in New Zealand.
McKenzie F; Ellison-Loschmann L; Jeffreys M
Ethn Health; 2011 Dec; 16(6):535-49. PubMed ID: 21644117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic factors in women with breast cancer: inequalities by ethnicity and socioeconomic position in New Zealand.
McKenzie F; Jeffreys M; 't Mannetje A; Pearce N
Cancer Causes Control; 2008 May; 19(4):403-11. PubMed ID: 18066672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Persistent area socioeconomic disparities in U.S. incidence of cervical cancer, mortality, stage, and survival, 1975-2000.
Singh GK; Miller BA; Hankey BF; Edwards BK
Cancer; 2004 Sep; 101(5):1051-7. PubMed ID: 15329915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A study of Pap test history and histologically determined cervical cancer in NSW women, 1997-2003.
Morrell S; Taylor R; Wain G
J Med Screen; 2005; 12(4):190-6. PubMed ID: 16417696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical cancer in New Zealand: national and regional trends.
Cox B; Borman B
N Z Med J; 1994 Aug; 107(984):323-6. PubMed ID: 8072727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of cervical cancer screening over cervical cancer mortality among Japanese women.
Aklimunnessa K; Mori M; Khan MM; Sakauchi F; Kubo T; Fujino Y; Suzuki S; Tokudome S; Tamakoshi A; ; Motohashi Y; Tsuji I; Nakamura Y; Iso H; Mikami H; Inaba Y; Hoshiyama Y; Suzuki H; Shimizu H; Toyoshima H; Wakai K; Ito Y; Hashimoto S; Kikuchi S; Koizumi A; Kawamura T; Watanabe Y; Miki T; Date C; Sakata K; Nose T; Hayakawa N; Yoshimura T; Shibata A; Okamoto N; Shino H; Ohno Y; Kitagawa T; Kuroki T; Tajima K
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2006 Aug; 36(8):511-8. PubMed ID: 16844732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences in screening history, tumour characteristics and survival between women with screen-detected versus not screen-detected cervical cancer in the east of The Netherlands, 1992-2001.
van der Aa MA; Schutter EM; Looijen-Salamon M; Martens JE; Siesling S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug; 139(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 18093720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prevalence of self-reported cervical cancer screening and impact on cervical cancer mortality in Austria.
Vutuc C; Haidinger G; Waldhoer T; Ahmad F; Breitenecker G
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1999 May; 111(9):354-9. PubMed ID: 10407996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Human papillomaviruses and other influences on survival from cervical cancer in Panama.
DeBritton RC; Hildesheim A; De Lao SL; Brinton LA; Sathya P; Reeves WC
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jan; 81(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 8380103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Access and society as determinants of ischaemic heart disease in indigenous populations.
Curtis E; Harwood M; Riddell T; Robson B; Harris R; Mills C; Reid P
Heart Lung Circ; 2010; 19(5-6):316-24. PubMed ID: 20444647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Socioeconomic status and cervical cancer survival among older women: findings from the SEER-Medicare linked data cohorts.
Coker AL; Du XL; Fang S; Eggleston KS
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Aug; 102(2):278-84. PubMed ID: 16434087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethnic differences in breast cancer in Hawai'i: age, stage, hormone receptor status, and survival.
Braun KL; Fong M; Gotay CC; Chong CD
Pac Health Dialog; 2004 Sep; 11(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 16281692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Achieving equitable outcomes for Māori women with cervical cancer in New Zealand: health provider views.
McLeod M; Cormack D; Harris R; Robson B; Sykes P; Crengle S
N Z Med J; 2011 May; 124(1334):52-62. PubMed ID: 21946636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
