These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19850277)

  • 41. Transradial approach (left vs right) and procedural times during percutaneous coronary procedures: TALENT study.
    Sciahbasi A; Romagnoli E; Burzotta F; Trani C; Sarandrea A; Summaria F; Pendenza G; Tommasino A; Patrizi R; Mazzari M; Mongiardo R; Lioy E
    Am Heart J; 2011 Jan; 161(1):172-9. PubMed ID: 21167351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Radiation doses to Norwegian heart-transplanted patients undergoing annual coronary angiography.
    Seierstad T; Friberg EG; Lervåg C; Widmark A; Wilhelmsen N; Stranden E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 May; 149(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 21775318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Three-dimensional rotational X-ray acquisition technique is reducing patients' cancer risk in coronary angiography.
    Eloot L; Bacher K; Steenbeke F; Drieghe B; Gheeraert P; Taeymans Y; Thierens H
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 82(4):E419-27. PubMed ID: 23420705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Total entrance skin dose: an effective indicator of maximum radiation dose to the skin during percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Chida K; Kagaya Y; Saito H; Takai Y; Takahashi S; Yamada S; Kohzuki M; Zuguchi M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):W224-7. PubMed ID: 17885036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Patient dose in cardiac radiology.
    Stratis AI; Anthopoulos PL; Gavaliatsis IP; Ifantis GP; Salahas AI; Antonellis IP; Tavernarakis AG; Molfetas MI
    Hellenic J Cardiol; 2009; 50(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 19196617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Reducing radiation exposure during invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions implementing a simple four-step protocol.
    Seiffert M; Ojeda F; Müllerleile K; Zengin E; Sinning C; Waldeyer C; Lubos E; Schäfer U; Sydow K; Blankenberg S; Westermann D
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2015 Jun; 104(6):500-6. PubMed ID: 25608615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of patient dose in two-dimensional carotid arteriography and three-dimensional rotational angiography.
    Tsapaki V; Vano E; Muavrikou I; Nueofotistou V; Gallego JJ; Fernandez JM; Santos E; Mendez J
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2008; 31(3):477-82. PubMed ID: 17952503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of rotational with conventional coronary angiography.
    Empen K; Kuon E; Hummel A; Gebauer C; Dörr M; Könemann R; Hoffmann W; Staudt A; Weitmann K; Reffelmann T; Felix SB
    Am Heart J; 2010 Sep; 160(3):552-63. PubMed ID: 20826266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Radiation Exposure to the Patient During Diagnostic Coronary Angiogram at Dhulikhel Hospital.
    Humagain S; Maharjan R; Koju R
    Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2015; 13(49):61-3. PubMed ID: 26620751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (XPERSWING) versus conventional technique in routine practice.
    Gómez-Menchero AE; Díaz JF; Sánchez-González C; Cardenal R; Sanghvi AB; Roa-Garrido J; Rodríguez-López JL
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2012 May; 65(5):434-9. PubMed ID: 22465608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Analysis of a Low Dose Protocol to Reduce Patient Radiation Exposure During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.
    Maccagni D; Godino C; Latib A; Azzalini L; Pazzanese V; Chieffo A; Margonato A; Colombo A
    Am J Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 119(2):203-209. PubMed ID: 27863695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of fluoro and cine coronary angiography: balancing acceptable outcomes with a reduction in radiation dose.
    Olcay A; Guler E; Karaca IO; Omaygenc MO; Kizilirmak F; Olgun E; Yenipinar E; Cakmak HA; Duman D
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2015 Apr; 27(4):199-202. PubMed ID: 25840403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF PATIENT RADIATION DOSES IN DIGITAL CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY AND INTERVENTIONS.
    Al-Jabri AJ; Alzimami K; Alsafi K; Alaamer AS; Al-Rajhi MA; Suliman II
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jun; 183(4):496-501. PubMed ID: 30260437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Short communication: time of day influences patient radiation exposure from percutaneous cardiac interventions.
    Kuon E; Dahm JB; Schmitt M; Glaser C; Gefeller O; Pfahlberg A
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Mar; 76(903):189-91. PubMed ID: 12684234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of Contrast Volume, Radiation Dose, Fluoroscopy Time, and Procedure Time in Previously Published Studies of Rotational Versus Conventional Coronary Angiography.
    Loomba RS; Rios R; Buelow M; Eagam M; Aggarwal S; Arora RR
    Am J Cardiol; 2015 Jul; 116(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 25983128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Local Diagnostic Reference Levels in Interventional Radiology.
    Ou-Saada I; Boujemaa S; Campoleoni M; Brambilla R; Bentayeb F
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2020 Jun; 51(2):307-311. PubMed ID: 32278664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Role of Experience, Leadership and Individual Protection in the Cath Lab--A Multicenter Questionnaire and Workshop on Radiation Safety.
    Kuon E; Weitmann K; Hoffmann W; Dörr M; Hummel A; Busch MC; Felix SB; Empen K
    Rofo; 2015 Oct; 187(10):899-905. PubMed ID: 26062173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Reporting of radiation exposure in contemporary interventional cardiology trials.
    Vargas A; Shroff AR; Vidovich MI
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Oct; 80(4):570-4. PubMed ID: 22121060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational angiography versus standard angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
    Maddux JT; Wink O; Messenger JC; Groves BM; Liao R; Strzelczyk J; Chen SY; Carroll JD
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2004 Jun; 62(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 15170705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A comparison between dual axis rotational coronary angiography and conventional coronary angiography.
    Grech M; Debono J; Xuereb RG; Fenech A; Grech V
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Oct; 80(4):576-80. PubMed ID: 22105940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.