These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
44. Total entrance skin dose: an effective indicator of maximum radiation dose to the skin during percutaneous coronary intervention. Chida K; Kagaya Y; Saito H; Takai Y; Takahashi S; Yamada S; Kohzuki M; Zuguchi M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):W224-7. PubMed ID: 17885036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparison of rotational with conventional coronary angiography. Empen K; Kuon E; Hummel A; Gebauer C; Dörr M; Könemann R; Hoffmann W; Staudt A; Weitmann K; Reffelmann T; Felix SB Am Heart J; 2010 Sep; 160(3):552-63. PubMed ID: 20826266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Radiation Exposure to the Patient During Diagnostic Coronary Angiogram at Dhulikhel Hospital. Humagain S; Maharjan R; Koju R Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2015; 13(49):61-3. PubMed ID: 26620751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Analysis of a Low Dose Protocol to Reduce Patient Radiation Exposure During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. Maccagni D; Godino C; Latib A; Azzalini L; Pazzanese V; Chieffo A; Margonato A; Colombo A Am J Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 119(2):203-209. PubMed ID: 27863695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of fluoro and cine coronary angiography: balancing acceptable outcomes with a reduction in radiation dose. Olcay A; Guler E; Karaca IO; Omaygenc MO; Kizilirmak F; Olgun E; Yenipinar E; Cakmak HA; Duman D J Invasive Cardiol; 2015 Apr; 27(4):199-202. PubMed ID: 25840403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF PATIENT RADIATION DOSES IN DIGITAL CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY AND INTERVENTIONS. Al-Jabri AJ; Alzimami K; Alsafi K; Alaamer AS; Al-Rajhi MA; Suliman II Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jun; 183(4):496-501. PubMed ID: 30260437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Short communication: time of day influences patient radiation exposure from percutaneous cardiac interventions. Kuon E; Dahm JB; Schmitt M; Glaser C; Gefeller O; Pfahlberg A Br J Radiol; 2003 Mar; 76(903):189-91. PubMed ID: 12684234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison of Contrast Volume, Radiation Dose, Fluoroscopy Time, and Procedure Time in Previously Published Studies of Rotational Versus Conventional Coronary Angiography. Loomba RS; Rios R; Buelow M; Eagam M; Aggarwal S; Arora RR Am J Cardiol; 2015 Jul; 116(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 25983128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Local Diagnostic Reference Levels in Interventional Radiology. Ou-Saada I; Boujemaa S; Campoleoni M; Brambilla R; Bentayeb F J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2020 Jun; 51(2):307-311. PubMed ID: 32278664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Role of Experience, Leadership and Individual Protection in the Cath Lab--A Multicenter Questionnaire and Workshop on Radiation Safety. Kuon E; Weitmann K; Hoffmann W; Dörr M; Hummel A; Busch MC; Felix SB; Empen K Rofo; 2015 Oct; 187(10):899-905. PubMed ID: 26062173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Reporting of radiation exposure in contemporary interventional cardiology trials. Vargas A; Shroff AR; Vidovich MI Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Oct; 80(4):570-4. PubMed ID: 22121060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Randomized study of the safety and clinical utility of rotational angiography versus standard angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Maddux JT; Wink O; Messenger JC; Groves BM; Liao R; Strzelczyk J; Chen SY; Carroll JD Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2004 Jun; 62(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 15170705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A comparison between dual axis rotational coronary angiography and conventional coronary angiography. Grech M; Debono J; Xuereb RG; Fenech A; Grech V Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Oct; 80(4):576-80. PubMed ID: 22105940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]