159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19851331)
1. Genetically modified abominations? Widespread opposition to GMOs might have deep-seated cultural causes.
Kwieciński J
EMBO Rep; 2009 Nov; 10(11):1187-90. PubMed ID: 19851331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Agricultural biotech. U.K. probes public opposition to GM crops.
Eastman Q
Science; 2003 Jun; 300(5626):1637-8. PubMed ID: 12805509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic engineering: unnatural selection.
Snow A
Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6949):619. PubMed ID: 12904767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Consumer acceptance of biotechnology and the role of second generation technologies in the USA and Europe.
Lusk JL; Rozan A
Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Aug; 23(8):386-7. PubMed ID: 15953650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The meaningless pseudo-category of "GMOs": The trouble with the "new techniques" for genetically modifying crops demonstrates the illogical process-based definition of GMOs in EU regulation.
Tagliabue G
EMBO Rep; 2016 Jan; 17(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 26559524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. GM plants for your health. The acceptance of GM crops in Europe might grow as soon as the first products to offer direct benefits for consumer health become available.
Breithaupt H
EMBO Rep; 2004 Nov; 5(11):1031-4. PubMed ID: 15520803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New Zealand GMO incident highlights lack of standardized tests.
Norrie C
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):861. PubMed ID: 12205493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of biotechnology in agriculture and the methods for the detection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in food.
Motti C; Dainese E; Mascini M; Minunni M; De Santis P; Cozzani I
Ital J Biochem; 2000; 49(3-4):52-6. PubMed ID: 11508058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Biotechnology and the European public.
Gaskell G; Allum N; Bauer M; Durant J; Allansdottir A; Bonfadelli H; Boy D; de Cheveigné S; Fjaestad B; Gutteling JM; Hampel J; Jelsøe E; Jesuino JC; Kohring M; Kronberger N; Midden C; Nielsen TH; Przestalski A; Rusanen T; Sakellaris G; Torgersen H; Twardowski T; Wagner W
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):935-8. PubMed ID: 10973210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. EC struggles to unravel regulations.
Hodgson J
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Jul; 18(7):705-6. PubMed ID: 10888826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Drugs in crops--the unpalatable truth.
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Feb; 22(2):133. PubMed ID: 14755274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Popular misconceptions: agricultural biotechnology.
McHughen A; Wager R
N Biotechnol; 2010 Dec; 27(6):724-8. PubMed ID: 20359558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Agrobiotechnology. Asia gets a taste of genetic food fights.
Normile D
Science; 2000 Aug; 289(5483):1279-81. PubMed ID: 10979850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The genetically modified organism conflict.
Somerville C
Plant Physiol; 2000 Aug; 123(4):1201-2. PubMed ID: 10938338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. How important is genetic engineering to European seed firms?
Arundel A; Hocke M; Tait J
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Jun; 18(6):578. PubMed ID: 10835548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ag biotech moves to mollify its critics.
Enserink M
Science; 1999 Nov; 286(5445):1666-8. PubMed ID: 10610558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. How can genetically modified foods be made publicly acceptable?
Rowe G
Trends Biotechnol; 2004 Mar; 22(3):107-9. PubMed ID: 15043045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Democratization is more than lower prices.
Cayford J
Science; 2003 Jul; 301(5630):167; author reply 167. PubMed ID: 12855789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Vatican panel backs GMOs.
Meldolesi A
Nat Biotechnol; 2011 Jan; 29(1):11. PubMed ID: 21221088
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Why GMOs].
Houdebine LM
J Soc Biol; 2009; 203(4):319-21. PubMed ID: 20122390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
