These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19851339)

  • 21. Evaluation of underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analyses: a simulation study of Bayesian and frequentist implementations of three models.
    Dohoo I; Stryhn H; Sanchez J
    Prev Vet Med; 2007 Sep; 81(1-3):38-55. PubMed ID: 17477995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of formal statistical significance on the credibility of observational associations.
    Ioannidis JP
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 168(4):374-83; discussion 384-90. PubMed ID: 18611956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Methods for meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies: critical assessment of empirical evidence.
    Gögele M; Minelli C; Thakkinstian A; Yurkiewich A; Pattaro C; Pramstaller PP; Little J; Attia J; Thompson JR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 175(8):739-49. PubMed ID: 22427610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improving power for testing genetic association in case-control studies by reducing the alternative space.
    Joo J; Kwak M; Zheng G
    Biometrics; 2010 Mar; 66(1):266-76. PubMed ID: 19397584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies.
    Thompson JR; Attia J; Minelli C
    Brief Bioinform; 2011 May; 12(3):259-69. PubMed ID: 21546449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Efficiency robust statistics for genetic linkage and association studies under genetic model uncertainty.
    Joo J; Kwak M; Chen Z; Zheng G
    Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(1):158-80. PubMed ID: 19918942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A simulation study comparing properties of heterogeneity measures in meta-analyses.
    Mittlböck M; Heinzl H
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4321-33. PubMed ID: 16991104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A multipoint method for meta-analysis of genetic association studies.
    Bagos PG; Liakopoulos TD
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 34(7):702-15. PubMed ID: 20853440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Meta-analysis: when and how.
    Imperiale TF
    Hepatology; 1999 Jun; 29(6 Suppl):26S-31S. PubMed ID: 10386080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. DNA repair gene XRCC3 polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 48 case-control studies.
    Han S; Zhang HT; Wang Z; Xie Y; Tang R; Mao Y; Li Y
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2006 Oct; 14(10):1136-44. PubMed ID: 16791138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Application of Meta-regression and subgroup analyses of heterogeneity disposal in Meta-analysis].
    Shi XQ; Wang ZZ
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2008 May; 29(5):497-501. PubMed ID: 18956686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dealing with heterogeneity between cohorts in genomewide SNP association studies.
    Lebrec JJ; Stijnen T; van Houwelingen HC
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article 8. PubMed ID: 20196758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantifying and correcting for the winner's curse in genetic association studies.
    Xiao R; Boehnke M
    Genet Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 33(5):453-62. PubMed ID: 19140131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The generalized odds ratio as a measure of genetic risk effect in the analysis and meta-analysis of association studies.
    Zintzaras E
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article21. PubMed ID: 20597847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies.
    de Bakker PI; Neale BM; Daly MJ
    Cold Spring Harb Protoc; 2010 Jun; 2010(6):pdb.top81. PubMed ID: 20516189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparing apples and oranges: equating the power of case-control and quantitative trait association studies.
    Yang J; Wray NR; Visscher PM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2010 Apr; 34(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 19918758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Genetic model selection in genome-wide association studies: robust methods and the use of meta-analysis.
    Bagos PG
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Jun; 12(3):285-308. PubMed ID: 23629457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. New insight into the genes susceptible to asthma.
    Gu ML; Dong XQ; Zhao J
    J Asthma; 2010 Mar; 47(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 20170315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Epilepsy Genetic Association Database (epiGAD): analysis of 165 genetic association studies, 1996-2008.
    Tan NC; Berkovic SF
    Epilepsia; 2010 Apr; 51(4):686-9. PubMed ID: 20074235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accurate modeling of replication rates in genome-wide association studies by accounting for Winner's Curse and study-specific heterogeneity.
    Zou J; Zhou J; Faller S; Brown RP; Sankararaman SS; Eskin E
    G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Dec; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 36250793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.