These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19851423)

  • 1. Survey of descriptors on cigarette packs: still misleading consumers?
    Peace J; Wilson N; Hoek J; Edwards R; Thomson G
    N Z Med J; 2009 Sep; 122(1303):90-6. PubMed ID: 19851423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating missed government tax revenue from foreign tobacco: survey of discarded cigarette packs.
    Wilson N; Thomson G; Edwards R; Peace J
    Tob Control; 2009 Oct; 18(5):416-8. PubMed ID: 19648132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consumer perceptions of cigarette pack design in France: a comparison of regular, limited edition and plain packaging.
    Gallopel-Morvan K; Moodie C; Hammond D; Eker F; Beguinot E; Martinet Y
    Tob Control; 2012 Sep; 21(5):502-6. PubMed ID: 21998127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Packaging colour research by tobacco companies: the pack as a product characteristic.
    Lempert LK; Glantz S
    Tob Control; 2017 May; 26(3):307-315. PubMed ID: 27255118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Graphic warning labels on plain cigarette packs: will they make a difference to adolescents?
    McCool J; Webb L; Cameron LD; Hoek J
    Soc Sci Med; 2012 Apr; 74(8):1269-73. PubMed ID: 22385817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of dissuasive packaging on young adult smokers.
    Hoek J; Wong C; Gendall P; Louviere J; Cong K
    Tob Control; 2011 May; 20(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 20966135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of variant descriptors on the potential effectiveness of plain packaging.
    Borland R; Savvas S
    Tob Control; 2014 Jan; 23(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 23436139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How does increasingly plainer cigarette packaging influence adult smokers' perceptions about brand image? An experimental study.
    Wakefield MA; Germain D; Durkin SJ
    Tob Control; 2008 Dec; 17(6):416-21. PubMed ID: 18827035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents.
    Wakefield M; Morley C; Horan JK; Cummings KM
    Tob Control; 2002 Mar; 11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):I73-80. PubMed ID: 11893817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of cigarette pack shape, size and opening: evidence from tobacco company documents.
    Kotnowski K; Hammond D
    Addiction; 2013 Sep; 108(9):1658-68. PubMed ID: 23600674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. US Smokers' Beliefs, Experiences and Perceptions of Different Cigarette Variants Before and After the FSPTCA Ban on Misleading Descriptors Such as "Light," "Mild," or "Low".
    Yong HH; Borland R; Cummings KM; Lindblom EN; Li L; Bansal-Travers M; O'Connor RJ; Elton-Marshall T; Thrasher JF; Hammond D; Thompson ME; Partos TR
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2016 Nov; 18(11):2115-2123. PubMed ID: 27083215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cigarette pack design and perceptions of risk among UK adults and youth.
    Hammond D; Dockrell M; Arnott D; Lee A; McNeill A
    Eur J Public Health; 2009 Dec; 19(6):631-7. PubMed ID: 19726589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. American Spirit Pack Descriptors and Perceptions of Harm: A Crowdsourced Comparison of Modified Packs.
    Pearson JL; Richardson A; Feirman SP; Villanti AC; Cantrell J; Cohn A; Tacelosky M; Kirchner TR
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2016 Aug; 18(8):1749-56. PubMed ID: 27170707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Promoting health (implicitly)? A longitudinal content analysis of implicit health information in cigarette advertising, 1954-2003.
    Paek HJ; Reid LN; Choi H; Jeong HJ
    J Health Commun; 2010 Oct; 15(7):769-87. PubMed ID: 21104505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adolescents' perceptions of cigarette brand image: does plain packaging make a difference?
    Germain D; Wakefield MA; Durkin SJ
    J Adolesc Health; 2010 Apr; 46(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 20307829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Deadly in pink: the impact of cigarette packaging among young women.
    Doxey J; Hammond D
    Tob Control; 2011 Sep; 20(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 21478476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of cigarette branding and plain packaging on female youth in the United Kingdom.
    Hammond D; Daniel S; White CM
    J Adolesc Health; 2013 Feb; 52(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 23332478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring the effect of cigarette plain packaging on transaction times and selection errors in a simulation experiment.
    Carter OB; Mills BW; Phan T; Bremner JR
    Tob Control; 2012 Nov; 21(6):572-7. PubMed ID: 21948807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Young adults' interpretations of tobacco brands: implications for tobacco control.
    Gendall P; Hoek J; Thomson G; Edwards R; Pene G; Gifford H; Pirikahu G; McCool J
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2011 Oct; 13(10):911-8. PubMed ID: 21622495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Young adult smokers' perceptions of plain packaging: a pilot naturalistic study.
    Moodie C; Mackintosh AM; Hastings G; Ford A
    Tob Control; 2011 Sep; 20(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 21752795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.