These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19851466)

  • 1. Can survival prediction be improved by merging gene expression data sets?
    Yasrebi H; Sperisen P; Praz V; Bucher P
    PLoS One; 2009 Oct; 4(10):e7431. PubMed ID: 19851466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative study of joint analysis of microarray gene expression data in survival prediction and risk assessment of breast cancer patients.
    Yasrebi H
    Brief Bioinform; 2016 Sep; 17(5):771-85. PubMed ID: 26504096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Novel 18-Marker Panel Predicting Clinical Outcome in Breast Cancer.
    Biermann J; Nemes S; Parris TZ; Engqvist H; Rönnerman EW; Forssell-Aronsson E; Steineck G; Karlsson P; Helou K
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2017 Nov; 26(11):1619-1628. PubMed ID: 28877888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of evaluation criteria for survival prediction from genomic data.
    Bøvelstad HM; Borgan O
    Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):202-16. PubMed ID: 21308723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. NCC-AUC: an AUC optimization method to identify multi-biomarker panel for cancer prognosis from genomic and clinical data.
    Zou M; Liu Z; Zhang XS; Wang Y
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Oct; 31(20):3330-8. PubMed ID: 26092859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gene expression analysis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma using gene set enrichment analysis for biostatistical management.
    Maruschke M; Reuter D; Koczan D; Hakenberg OW; Thiesen HJ
    BJU Int; 2011 Jul; 108(2 Pt 2):E29-35. PubMed ID: 21435154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of performance of survival prediction models for cancer prognosis.
    Chen HC; Kodell RL; Cheng KF; Chen JJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Jul; 12():102. PubMed ID: 22824262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Module-based outcome prediction using breast cancer compendia.
    van Vliet MH; Klijn CN; Wessels LF; Reinders MJ
    PLoS One; 2007 Oct; 2(10):e1047. PubMed ID: 17940611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrating biological knowledge with gene expression profiles for survival prediction of cancer.
    Chen X; Wang L
    J Comput Biol; 2009 Feb; 16(2):265-78. PubMed ID: 19183004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simple but highly effective approach to evaluate the prognostic performance of gene expression signatures.
    Starmans MH; Fung G; Steck H; Wouters BG; Lambin P
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e28320. PubMed ID: 22163293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integrative analysis of survival-associated gene sets in breast cancer.
    Varn FS; Ung MH; Lou SK; Cheng C
    BMC Med Genomics; 2015 Mar; 8():11. PubMed ID: 25881247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decentralized Learning Framework of Meta-Survival Analysis for Developing Robust Prognostic Signatures.
    Cui Y; Li B; Li R
    JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2017 Nov; 1():1-13. PubMed ID: 30657395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A gene-expression profiling score for prediction of outcome in patients with follicular lymphoma: a retrospective training and validation analysis in three international cohorts.
    Huet S; Tesson B; Jais JP; Feldman AL; Magnano L; Thomas E; Traverse-Glehen A; Albaud B; Carrère M; Xerri L; Ansell SM; Baseggio L; Reyes C; Tarte K; Boyault S; Haioun C; Link BK; Feugier P; Lopez-Guillermo A; Tilly H; Brice P; Hayette S; Jardin F; Offner F; Sujobert P; Gentien D; Viari A; Campo E; Cerhan JR; Salles G
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Apr; 19(4):549-561. PubMed ID: 29475724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Partial least squares dimension reduction for microarray gene expression data with a censored response.
    Nguyen DV
    Math Biosci; 2005 Jan; 193(1):119-37. PubMed ID: 15681279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An ensemble machine learning approach to predict survival in breast cancer.
    Djebbari A; Liu Z; Phan S; Famili F
    Int J Comput Biol Drug Des; 2008; 1(3):275-94. PubMed ID: 20054993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Construction and Validation of a Prognostic Gene-Based Model for Overall Survival Prediction in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using an Integrated Statistical and Bioinformatic Approach.
    Dessie EY; Tu SJ; Chiang HS; Tsai JJP; Chang YS; Chang JG; Ng KL
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Feb; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33562824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intratumor heterogeneity and precision of microarray-based predictors of breast cancer biology and clinical outcome.
    Barry WT; Kernagis DN; Dressman HK; Griffis RJ; Hunter JD; Olson JA; Marks JR; Ginsburg GS; Marcom PK; Nevins JR; Geradts J; Datto MB
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 May; 28(13):2198-206. PubMed ID: 20368555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Merging microarray data from separate breast cancer studies provides a robust prognostic test.
    Xu L; Tan AC; Winslow RL; Geman D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 9():125. PubMed ID: 18304324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles related to relapse-free survival in 1,079 breast cancer patients.
    Györffy B; Schäfer R
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Dec; 118(3):433-41. PubMed ID: 19052860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Module-based prediction approach for robust inter-study predictions in microarray data.
    Mi Z; Shen K; Song N; Cheng C; Song C; Kaminski N; Tseng GC
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Oct; 26(20):2586-93. PubMed ID: 20719761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.