These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Practice makes perfect: High performance gains in older adults engaged in selective attention within and across sensory modalities. Rienäcker F; Jacobs HIL; Van Heugten CM; Van Gerven PWM Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():101-111. PubMed ID: 30240890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Oculomotor interference of bimodal distractors. Heeman J; Nijboer TC; Van der Stoep N; Theeuwes J; Van der Stigchel S Vision Res; 2016 Jun; 123():46-55. PubMed ID: 27164053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aging and response interference across sensory modalities. Guerreiro MJ; Adam JJ; Van Gerven PW Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Jun; 21(3):836-42. PubMed ID: 24272666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Why two "Distractors" are better than one: modeling the effect of non-target auditory and tactile stimuli on visual saccadic reaction time. Diederich A; Colonius H Exp Brain Res; 2007 May; 179(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 17216154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect. Koppen C; Spence C Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 180(4):737-54. PubMed ID: 17333012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inhibition in movement plan competition: reach trajectories curve away from remembered and task-irrelevant present but not from task-irrelevant past visual stimuli. Moehler T; Fiehler K Exp Brain Res; 2017 Nov; 235(11):3251-3260. PubMed ID: 28765992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multisensory Integration Develops Prior to Crossmodal Recalibration. Rohlf S; Li L; Bruns P; Röder B Curr Biol; 2020 May; 30(9):1726-1732.e7. PubMed ID: 32197090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Failures in top-down control in schizophrenia revealed by patterns of saccadic eye movements. Bansal S; Robinson BM; Leonard CJ; Hahn B; Luck SJ; Gold JM J Abnorm Psychol; 2019 Jul; 128(5):415-422. PubMed ID: 31192637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computing an optimal time window of audiovisual integration in focused attention tasks: illustrated by studies on effect of age and prior knowledge. Colonius H; Diederich A Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jul; 212(3):327-37. PubMed ID: 21626414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differences in distractor-induced deviation between horizontal and vertical saccade trajectories. Van der Stigchel S; Theeuwes J Neuroreport; 2008 Jan; 19(2):251-4. PubMed ID: 18185118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Repelling the young and attracting the old: examining age-related differences in saccade trajectory deviations. Campbell KL; Al-Aidroos N; Pratt J; Hasher L Psychol Aging; 2009 Mar; 24(1):163-8. PubMed ID: 19290747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]