These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19852309)

  • 1. Are changes in pitch and formants enough to influence talker normalization processes in children and adults?
    Kishon-Rabin L; Taitelbaum-Swead R; Salomon R; Slutzkin M; Amir N
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2009; 20(3):219-32. PubMed ID: 19852309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech perception in children with cochlear implants: effects of lexical difficulty, talker variability, and word length.
    Kirk KI; Hay-McCutcheon M; Sehgal ST; Miyamoto RT
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():79-81. PubMed ID: 11141016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of talker variability on word recognition in preschool children.
    Ryalls BO; Pisoni DB
    Dev Psychol; 1997 May; 33(3):441-52. PubMed ID: 9149923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of recognition performances in speech-spectrum noise by listeners with normal hearing on PB-50, CID W-22, NU-6, W-1 spondaic words, and monosyllabic digits spoken by the same speaker.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Roberts H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):496-506. PubMed ID: 19253782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developmental Effects in Children's Ability to Benefit From F0 Differences Between Target and Masker Speech.
    Flaherty MM; Buss E; Leibold LJ
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):927-937. PubMed ID: 30334835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multi-Talker Speech Promotes Greater Knowledge-Based Spoken Mandarin Word Recognition in First and Second Language Listeners.
    Wiener S; Lee CY
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():214. PubMed ID: 32161560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unequal effects of speech and nonspeech contexts on the perceptual normalization of Cantonese level tones.
    Zhang C; Peng G; Wang WS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1088-99. PubMed ID: 22894228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intelligibility of emotional speech in younger and older adults.
    Dupuis K; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 25127327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of talker- and listener-related factors on intelligibility for a real-word, open-set perception test.
    Markham D; Hazan V
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 47(4):725-37. PubMed ID: 15324282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of stimulus variability on speech perception in listeners with hearing impairment.
    Kirk KI; Pisoni DB; Miyamoto RC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 40(6):1395-405. PubMed ID: 9430759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Some considerations in evaluating spoken word recognition by normal-hearing, noise-masked normal-hearing, and cochlear implant listeners. I: The effects of response format.
    Sommers MS; Kirk KI; Pisoni DB
    Ear Hear; 1997 Apr; 18(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 9099558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of differences in fundamental frequency on across-formant grouping in speech perception.
    Summers RJ; Bailey PJ; Roberts B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3667-77. PubMed ID: 21218899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of Open-Set Word Recognition in Children: Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Speech Maskers.
    Corbin NE; Bonino AY; Buss E; Leibold LJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 26226605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech perception and talker segregation: effects of level, pitch, and tactile support with multiple simultaneous talkers.
    Drullman R; Bronkhorst AW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3090-8. PubMed ID: 15603154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effect of Talker and Listener Depressive Symptoms on Speech Intelligibility.
    Yi H; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Dec; 62(12):4269-4281. PubMed ID: 31738862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.
    Allen JS; Miller JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3171-83. PubMed ID: 15237841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of talker variability on word recognition in non-native listeners.
    van Dommelen WA; Hazan V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1690-9. PubMed ID: 22978897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Carhart Memorial Lecture, American Auditory Society, Salt Lake City, Utah 1996. Phoneme and word recognition for words in isolation and in sentences.
    Olsen WO; Van Tasell DJ; Speaks CE
    Ear Hear; 1997 Jun; 18(3):175-88. PubMed ID: 9201453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.