509 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19852314)
21. Cost-effectiveness analysis of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteral calculi in eastern China.
Zhang J; Shi Q; Wang GZ; Wang F; Jiang N
Urol Int; 2011; 86(4):470-5. PubMed ID: 21597268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteral stones.
Lee YH; Tsai JY; Jiaan BP; Wu T; Yu CC
Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):480-4; discussion 484. PubMed ID: 16527562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral calculi: a prospective study.
Strohmaier WL; Schubert G; Rosenkranz T; Weigl A
Eur Urol; 1999 Nov; 36(5):376-9. PubMed ID: 10516445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi.
Koo V; Young M; Thompson T; Duggan B
BJU Int; 2011 Dec; 108(11):1913-6. PubMed ID: 21453346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The case for primary endoscopic management of upper urinary tract calculi: II. Cost and outcome assessment of 112 primary ureteral calculi.
Grasso M; Beaghler M; Loisides P
Urology; 1995 Mar; 45(3):372-6. PubMed ID: 7879330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for management of distal ureteral calculi.
Pearle MS; Nadler R; Bercowsky E; Chen C; Dunn M; Figenshau RS; Hoenig DM; McDougall EM; Mutz J; Nakada SY; Shalhav AL; Sundaram C; Wolf JS; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2001 Oct; 166(4):1255-60. PubMed ID: 11547053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ureteroscopy is more cost effective than shock wave lithotripsy for stone treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Geraghty RM; Jones P; Herrmann TRW; Aboumarzouk O; Somani BK
World J Urol; 2018 Nov; 36(11):1783-1793. PubMed ID: 29730839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of diuresis on extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy treatment of ureteric calculi.
Azm TA; Higazy H
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2002; 36(3):209-12. PubMed ID: 12201937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Treatment of ureteral calculi: report of 152 calculi].
Lamotte F; Izadifar V; Fontaine E; Barthélémy Y; Beurton D
Prog Urol; 2000 Feb; 10(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 10785914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones: a cumulative analysis of comparative studies.
Arcaniolo D; De Sio M; Rassweiler J; Nicholas J; Lima E; Carrieri G; Liatsikos E; Mirone V; Monga M; Autorino R
Urolithiasis; 2017 Dec; 45(6):563-572. PubMed ID: 28233025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of ureteroscopy to in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of distal ureteral calculi.
Turk TM; Jenkins AD
J Urol; 1999 Jan; 161(1):45-6; discussion 46-7. PubMed ID: 10037364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. TISU: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, as first treatment option, compared with direct progression to ureteroscopic treatment, for ureteric stones: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
McClinton S; Cameron S; Starr K; Thomas R; MacLennan G; McDonald A; Lam T; N'Dow J; Kilonzo M; Pickard R; Anson K; Keeley F; Burgess N; Clark CT; MacLennan S; Norrie J;
Trials; 2018 May; 19(1):286. PubMed ID: 29788982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Morbidity associated with surgical treatment of ureteric calculi in a teaching hospital in Kuwait.
Kehinde EO; Al-Awadi KA; Al-Hunayan A; Okasha GH; Al-Tawheed A; Ali Y
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2003 Sep; 85(5):340-6. PubMed ID: 14594540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Extracorporeal shock-wave versus pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy in treatment of lower ureteral calculi.
Zeng GQ; Zhong WD; Cai YB; Dai QS; Hu JB; Wei HA
Asian J Androl; 2002 Dec; 4(4):303-5. PubMed ID: 12508134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative analysis of direct and indirect costs of two minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of renal/ureteral calculi smaller than 2 cm.
Perez-Ardavin J; Lorenzo L; Caballer-Tarazona V; Budía-Alba A; Vivas-Consuelo D; Bahilo-Mateu P; Ordaz-Jurado G; Trassierra-Villa M; López-Acón JD; Boronat-Tormo F
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2020 Sep; 44(7):505-511. PubMed ID: 32593640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Treatment of lower urethral calculi with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a comparison of effectiveness and complications.
Zhong W; Zeng G; Cai Y; Dai Q; Hu J; Wei H
Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 Jul; 116(7):1001-3. PubMed ID: 12890371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi.
Aboumarzouk OM; Kata SG; Keeley FX; Nabi G
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Dec; (12):CD006029. PubMed ID: 22161396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cost-effectiveness comparison of ureteral calculi treated with ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy versus shockwave lithotripsy.
Cone EB; Pareek G; Ursiny M; Eisner B
World J Urol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):161-166. PubMed ID: 27145788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteric calculi: efficacy and patient satisfaction.
Ghalayini IF; Al-Ghazo MA; Khader YS
Int Braz J Urol; 2006; 32(6):656-64; discussion 664-7. PubMed ID: 17201943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Management of proximal ureteral stones].
Lechevallier E; Taxer O; Saussine C
Prog Urol; 2008 Dec; 18(12):977-80. PubMed ID: 19033065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
