216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19852610)
1. Cephalometric floating norms as a guide toward a harmonious individual craniofacial pattern among Filipinos.
Sevilla-Naranjilla MA; Rudzki-Janson I
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1162-8. PubMed ID: 19852610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Linear and angular filipino cephalometric norms according to age and sex.
Moldez MA; Sato K; Sugawara J; Mitani H
Angle Orthod; 2006 Sep; 76(5):800-5. PubMed ID: 17029513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods.
Arat ZM; Rübendüz M; Akgül AA
Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 12940557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in craniofacial characteristics in Southern Italian children from Naples: a retrospective study by cephalometric analysis.
Perillo L; Isola G; Esercizio D; Iovane M; Triolo G; Matarese G
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Sep; 14(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 24295003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visualization of individual growth-related craniofacial changes based on cephalometric landmark data: a pilot study.
Lux CJ; Starke J; Rübel J; Stellzig A; Komposch G
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 May; 39(3):341-52. PubMed ID: 12019012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Palestinians norms of Steiner cephalometric analysis.
Hussien E; Al-Khateeb S; Mowais MA
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e5-9. PubMed ID: 21490988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Associations between the postural orientation of sella-nasion and skeletodental morphology.
Showfety KJ; Vig PS; Matteson S; Phillips C
Angle Orthod; 1987 Apr; 57(2):99-112. PubMed ID: 3473953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Forensic norms of female and male Lebanese adults.
Ayoub F; Yehia M; Rizk A; Al-Tannir M; Abi-Farah A; Hamadeh G
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2008 Jun; 26(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 22689353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Integration of parts in the facial skeleton and cervical vertebrae.
McCane B; Kean MR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):e13-30. PubMed ID: 21195254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cephalometric superimpositions.
Gu Y; McNamara JA
Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):967-76. PubMed ID: 18947269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Permutation method for evaluating topographic craniofacial correlations.
Halazonetis DJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):e211-7. PubMed ID: 21392664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determination of craniofacial relation among the subethnic Indian population: a modified approach - (Sagittal relation).
Felicita AS; Chandrasekar S; Shanthasundari KK
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 23059564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproducibility of maxillofacial anatomic landmarks on 3-dimensional computed tomographic images determined with the 95% confidence ellipse method.
Muramatsu A; Nawa H; Kimura M; Yoshida K; Maeda M; Katsumata A; Ariji E; Goto S
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 18416622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Floating norms for the ANB angle as guidance for clinical considerations.
Järvinen S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Nov; 90(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 3465233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship of the functional oropharynx to craniofacial morphology.
Trenouth MJ; Timms DJ
Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):419-23. PubMed ID: 10515139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating craniofacial asymmetry with digital cephalometric images and cone-beam computed tomography.
de Moraes ME; Hollender LG; Chen CS; Moraes LC; Balducci I
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):e523-31. PubMed ID: 21640864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Procuste cephalometry].
Penin X
Orthod Fr; 2006 Dec; 77(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 17402222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Craniofacial morphology in Chinese female twins: a semi-longitudinal cephalometric study.
Peng J; Deng H; Cao C; Ishikawa M
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):556-61. PubMed ID: 16257991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of craniofacial characteristics of typical Chinese and Caucasian young adults.
Gu Y; McNamara JA; Sigler LM; Baccetti T
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 20709723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
