209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19852616)
1. Selection, epistasis, and parent-of-origin effects on deleterious mutations across environments in Drosophila melanogaster.
Wang AD; Sharp NP; Spencer CC; Tedman-Aucoin K; Agrawal AF
Am Nat; 2009 Dec; 174(6):863-74. PubMed ID: 19852616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mating density and the strength of sexual selection against deleterious alleles in Drosophila melanogaster.
Sharp NP; Agrawal AF
Evolution; 2008 Apr; 62(4):857-67. PubMed ID: 18221380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of pathogens on selection against deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
Young JA; Yourth CP; Agrawal AF
J Evol Biol; 2009 Oct; 22(10):2125-9. PubMed ID: 19694894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variation in the strength and softness of selection on deleterious mutations.
Laffafian A; King JD; Agrawal AF
Evolution; 2010 Nov; 64(11):3232-41. PubMed ID: 20662923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks.
Azevedo RB; Lohaus R; Srinivasan S; Dang KK; Burch CL
Nature; 2006 Mar; 440(7080):87-90. PubMed ID: 16511495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Perspective: Sign epistasis and genetic constraint on evolutionary trajectories.
Weinreich DM; Watson RA; Chao L
Evolution; 2005 Jun; 59(6):1165-74. PubMed ID: 16050094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sexual recombination and the power of natural selection.
Rice WR; Chippindale AK
Science; 2001 Oct; 294(5542):555-9. PubMed ID: 11641490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Compensated deleterious mutations in insect genomes.
Kulathinal RJ; Bettencourt BR; Hartl DL
Science; 2004 Nov; 306(5701):1553-4. PubMed ID: 15498973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensitivity of the distribution of mutational fitness effects to environment, genetic background, and adaptedness: a case study with Drosophila.
Wang AD; Sharp NP; Agrawal AF
Evolution; 2014 Mar; 68(3):840-53. PubMed ID: 24206451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mutation-selection balance accounting for genetic variation for viability in Drosophila melanogaster as deduced from an inbreeding and artificial selection experiment.
Rodríguez-Ramilo ST; Pérez-Figueroa A; Fernández B; Fernández J; Caballero A
J Evol Biol; 2004 May; 17(3):528-41. PubMed ID: 15149396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Environmental stress increases selection against and dominance of deleterious mutations in inbred families of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas.
Plough LV
Mol Ecol; 2012 Aug; 21(16):3974-87. PubMed ID: 22747636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selection, gene interaction, and flexible gene networks.
Greenspan RJ
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol; 2009; 74():131-8. PubMed ID: 19903749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimates of the genomic mutation rate for detrimental alleles in Drosophila melanogaster.
Charlesworth B; Borthwick H; Bartolomé C; Pignatelli P
Genetics; 2004 Jun; 167(2):815-26. PubMed ID: 15238530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence for overdominant selection maintaining X-linked fitness variation in Drosophila melanogaster.
Connallon T; Knowles LL
Evolution; 2006 Jul; 60(7):1445-53. PubMed ID: 16929661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of deleterious mutations and age on recombination in Drosophila melanogaster.
Tedman-Aucoin K; Agrawal AF
Evolution; 2012 Feb; 66(2):575-85. PubMed ID: 22276549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sexual selection is ineffectual or inhibits the purging of deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
Arbuthnott D; Rundle HD
Evolution; 2012 Jul; 66(7):2127-37. PubMed ID: 22759290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chromosomal effects of rapid gene evolution in Drosophila melanogaster.
Nurminsky D; Aguiar DD; Bustamante CD; Hartl DL
Science; 2001 Jan; 291(5501):128-30. PubMed ID: 11141564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sexual selection accelerates the elimination of a deleterious mutant in Drosophila melanogaster.
Hollis B; Fierst JL; Houle D
Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 19154371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A measure of the within-chromosome synergistic epistasis for Drosophila viability.
Rosa JM; Camacho S; García-Dorado A
J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):1130-7. PubMed ID: 16033587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Age-specific changes in epistatic effects on mortality rate in Drosophila melanogaster.
Spencer CC; Promislow DE
J Hered; 2005; 96(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 15958798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
