366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19852635)
1. Long-term dentoskeletal changes with the Bionator, Herbst, Twin Block, and MARA functional appliances.
Siara-Olds NJ; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger J; Bayirli B
Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 19852635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes induced by bionator therapy.
Malta LA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Faltin K; McNamara JA
Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 19852634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanisms of Class II correction induced by the crown Herbst appliance as a single-phase Class II therapy: 1 year follow-up.
Jakobsone G; Latkauskiene D; McNamara JA
Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep; 14():27. PubMed ID: 24326090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
Burhan AS; Nawaya FR
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25296729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does mandibular advancement with clear aligners have the same skeletal and dentoalveolar effects as traditional functional appliances?
Wu Y; Yu Q; Xia Y; Wang B; Chen S; Gu K; Zhang B; Zhu M
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Feb; 23(1):65. PubMed ID: 36732724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
Baysal A; Uysal T
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term effects of Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy.
Omblus J; Malmgren O; Pancherz H; Hägg U; Hansen K
Eur J Orthod; 1997 Apr; 19(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 9183068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dental and skeletal changes in patients with mandibular retrognathism following treatment with Herbst and pre-adjusted fixed appliance.
de Abreu Vigorito F; Dominguez GC; de Arruda Aidar LA
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 24713559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cephalometric analysis of changes produced by a modified Herbst appliance in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion.
Sidhu MS; Kharbanda OP; Sidhu SS
Br J Orthod; 1995 Feb; 22(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 7786859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mandibular incisor position changes in relation to amount of bite jumping during Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment: a radiographic-cephalometric study.
Martin J; Pancherz H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19577147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance in patients with Class II skeletal malocclusions.
Pangrazio MN; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Bayirli B; Movahhedian A
Angle Orthod; 2012 Nov; 82(6):971-7. PubMed ID: 22432591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Twin-block and mandibular anterior repositioning appliances effects in Class II malocclusion correction.
Bastiani C; Bellini-Pereira SA; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Chiqueto K; Castanha Henriques JF; Janson G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Feb; 163(2):181-190. PubMed ID: 36202696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part I--The hard tissues.
Illing HM; Morris DO; Lee RT
Eur J Orthod; 1998 Oct; 20(5):501-16. PubMed ID: 9825553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment effects of the Jasper Jumper and the Bionator associated with fixed appliances.
Neves LS; Janson G; Cançado RH; de Lima KJ; Fernandes TM; Henriques JF
Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):54. PubMed ID: 25182030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of treatment outcomes with crowned and banded mandibular anterior repositioning appliance (MARA) in Class II pubertal subjects: A retrospective cohort study.
Al-Jewair T; Ghorbaniparvar M; Franchi L; Flores-Mir C
Int Orthod; 2020 Jun; 18(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 32111577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
