These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19852644)

  • 41. Cephalometric assessment of soft tissue morphology of patients with acromegaly.
    Bavbek NC; Tuncer BB; Tuncer C; Gungor K; Ozkan C; Arslan E; Altinova AE; Akturk M; Toruner FB
    Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 27468591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Esthetic preferences of orthodontists, dentists, and plastic surgeons for balanced facial profiles.
    Milutinovic J; Aleksic E; Avramov S; Kalevski K; Gajic M; Pejanovic D; Milic J
    J Oral Sci; 2023 Mar; 65(2):73-76. PubMed ID: 36823034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Retrospective evaluation of facial soft tissue cephalometric parameters in adolescents with normal occlusion.
    Poosti M; Ramezanzadeh B; Salehi T; Rashed R
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(2):15-8. PubMed ID: 20687311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A new method for locating anterior skeletal landmarks from soft tissue measurements.
    Ligthelm-Bakker AS; Prahl-Andersen B; Wattel E; Uljee IH
    J Biol Buccale; 1991 Dec; 19(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 1791165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Dentoskeletal determinants of soft tissue morphology.
    Saxby PJ; Freer TJ
    Angle Orthod; 1985 Apr; 55(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 3860026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Changes in soft tissue profile after sagittal split ramus osteotomy and retropositioning of the mandible.
    Gaggl A; Schultes G; Kärcher H
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 May; 57(5):542-6; discussion 546-7. PubMed ID: 10319828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Determination of vertical dimension of occlusion in dentate patients by cephalometric analysis--pilot study.
    Tavano KT; Seraidarian PI; de Oliveira DD; Jansen WC
    Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e297-305. PubMed ID: 21323984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. McNamara norms for Turkish adolescents with balanced faces and normal occlusion.
    Kilic N; Catal G; Oktay H
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 May; 26(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 20575197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Changes in the facial profile following correction for mandibular prognathism.
    Fanibunda KB
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1989 Aug; 27(4):277-86. PubMed ID: 2765455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Vertical proportions of face: a cephalometric study.
    Kharbanda OP; Sidhu SS; Sundrum KR
    Int J Orthod; 1991; 29(3-4):6-8. PubMed ID: 1802874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Factors associated with the beauty of soft-tissue profile.
    Ghorbanyjavadpour F; Rakhshan V
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jun; 155(6):832-843. PubMed ID: 31153504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Electromyographic activity of masseter and temporal muscles with different facial types.
    Vianna-Lara MS; Caria PH; Tosello Dde O; Lara F; Amorim MM
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):515-20. PubMed ID: 19413373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A study of cephalometric soft tissue profile among adolescents from the three West African countries of Nigeria, Ghana and Senegal.
    Fadeju AD; Otuyemi OD; Ngom PI; Newman-Nartey M
    J Orthod; 2013 Mar; 40(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 23524548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in Yemeni men.
    Al-Gunaid T; Yamada K; Yamaki M; Saito I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):576.e7-14. PubMed ID: 18005826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Cephalometric analysis of dentofacial normals.
    Scheideman GB; Bell WH; Legan HL; Finn RA; Reisch JS
    Am J Orthod; 1980 Oct; 78(4):404-20. PubMed ID: 6933849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Three-dimensional evaluation of soft tissue change gradients after mandibular setback surgery in skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Lim YK; Chu EH; Lee DY; Yang IH; Baek SH
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):896-903. PubMed ID: 20578861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Changes in soft tissue profile following the treatment using a Herbst appliance--a photographic analysis.
    Nedeljković N; Cubrilo D; Hadzi-Mihailović M
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2014 Jan; 71(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 24516984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Steiner's cephalometric norms for the Nepalese population.
    Sharma JN
    J Orthod; 2011 Mar; 38(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 21367825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Correlation between sagittal photogrammetric measurements of the soft tissue profile and dental arches measurements].
    Diouf JS; Touré B; Ndiaye M; Badiane A; Diop-Bâ K; Ngom PI; Diagne F
    Orthod Fr; 2015 Dec; 86(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 26655417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.