These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19852965)

  • 1. Tick-susceptible Bos taurus cattle display an increased cellular response at the site of larval Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus attachment, compared with tick-resistant Bos indicus cattle.
    Piper EK; Jackson LA; Bielefeldt-Ohmann H; Gondro C; Lew-Tabor AE; Jonsson NN
    Int J Parasitol; 2010 Mar; 40(4):431-41. PubMed ID: 19852965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gene expression in the skin of Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle infested with the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus.
    Piper EK; Jackson LA; Bagnall NH; Kongsuwan KK; Lew AE; Jonsson NN
    Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 2008 Nov; 126(1-2):110-9. PubMed ID: 18676027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Local immune response against larvae of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in Bos taurus indicus and Bos taurus taurus cattle.
    Constantinoiu CC; Jackson LA; Jorgensen WK; Lew-Tabor AE; Piper EK; Mayer DG; Venus B; Jonsson NN
    Int J Parasitol; 2010 Jun; 40(7):865-75. PubMed ID: 20109460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modulation of cutaneous inflammation induced by ticks in contrasting phenotypes of infestation in bovines.
    Carvalho WA; Franzin AM; Abatepaulo AR; de Oliveira CJ; Moré DD; da Silva JS; Ferreira BR; de Miranda Santos IK
    Vet Parasitol; 2010 Feb; 167(2-4):260-73. PubMed ID: 19836891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Immune and biochemical responses in skin differ between bovine hosts genetically susceptible and resistant to the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus.
    Franzin AM; Maruyama SR; Garcia GR; Oliveira RP; Ribeiro JM; Bishop R; Maia AA; Moré DD; Ferreira BR; Santos IK
    Parasit Vectors; 2017 Jan; 10(1):51. PubMed ID: 28143523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Activation of several key components of the epidermal differentiation pathway in cattle following infestation with the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus.
    Kongsuwan K; Josh P; Colgrave ML; Bagnall NH; Gough J; Burns B; Pearson R
    Int J Parasitol; 2010 Mar; 40(4):499-507. PubMed ID: 19909754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative microarray analysis of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus expression profiles of larvae pre-attachment and feeding adult female stages on Bos indicus and Bos taurus cattle.
    Rodriguez-Valle M; Lew-Tabor A; Gondro C; Moolhuijzen P; Vance M; Guerrero FD; Bellgard M; Jorgensen W
    BMC Genomics; 2010 Jul; 11():437. PubMed ID: 20637126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the differential regulation of T and B-lymphocyte subsets in the skin and lymph nodes amongst three cattle breeds as potential mediators of immune-resistance to Rhipicephalus microplus.
    Robbertse L; Richards SA; Clift SJ; Barnard AC; Leisewitz A; Crafford JE; Maritz-Olivier C
    Ticks Tick Borne Dis; 2018 May; 9(4):976-987. PubMed ID: 29622516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rhipicephalus microplus lipocalins (LRMs): genomic identification and analysis of the bovine immune response using in silico predicted B and T cell epitopes.
    Rodriguez-Valle M; Moolhuijzen P; Piper EK; Weiss O; Vance M; Bellgard M; Lew-Tabor A
    Int J Parasitol; 2013 Aug; 43(9):739-52. PubMed ID: 23747800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microarray analysis of tick-infested skin in resistant and susceptible cattle confirms the role of inflammatory pathways in immune activation and larval rejection.
    Carvalho WA; Domingues R; de Azevedo Prata MC; da Silva MV; de Oliveira GC; Guimarães SE; Machado MA
    Vet Parasitol; 2014 Sep; 205(1-2):307-17. PubMed ID: 25108850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cattle Tick
    Tabor AE; Ali A; Rehman G; Rocha Garcia G; Zangirolamo AF; Malardo T; Jonsson NN
    Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2017; 7():506. PubMed ID: 29322033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Immunological profiles of Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle infested with the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus.
    Piper EK; Jonsson NN; Gondro C; Lew-Tabor AE; Moolhuijzen P; Vance ME; Jackson LA
    Clin Vaccine Immunol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):1074-86. PubMed ID: 19474263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differential expression of genes in resistant versus susceptible Gyr x Holstein cattle challenged with the tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus.
    Nascimento CS; Machado MA; Guimarães SE; Guimarães MF; Peixoto JO; Furlong J; Prata MC; Verneque RS; Teodoro RL; Lopes PS
    Genet Mol Res; 2010 Oct; 9(4):1974-9. PubMed ID: 20927715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus: distinct acute phase proteins vary during infestations according to the genetic composition of the bovine hosts, Bos taurus and Bos indicus.
    Carvalho WA; Bechara GH; Moré DD; Ferreira BR; da Silva JS; de Miranda Santos IK
    Exp Parasitol; 2008 Apr; 118(4):587-91. PubMed ID: 18171576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expressed sequenced tags profiling of resistant and susceptible Gyr x Holstein cattle infested with the tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus.
    Nascimento CS; Machado MA; Guimarães SE; Martins MF; Peixoto JO; Furlong J; Prata MC; Verneque RS; Teodoro RL; Lopes PS
    Genet Mol Res; 2011 Nov; 10(4):3803-16. PubMed ID: 22095475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acquisition and expression of resistance by Bos indicus and Bos indicus X Bos taurus calves to Amblyomma americanum infestation.
    George JE; Osburn RL; Wikel SK
    J Parasitol; 1985 Apr; 71(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 3998956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Immune recognition of salivary proteins from the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus differs according to the genotype of the bovine host.
    Garcia GR; Maruyama SR; Nelson KT; Ribeiro JM; Gardinassi LG; Maia AA; Ferreira BR; Kooyman FN; de Miranda Santos IK
    Parasit Vectors; 2017 Mar; 10(1):144. PubMed ID: 28288696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Productivity and health effects of anaplasmosis and babesiosis on Bos indicus cattle and their crosses, and the effects of differing intensity of tick control in Australia.
    Jonsson NN; Bock RE; Jorgensen WK
    Vet Parasitol; 2008 Aug; 155(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 18472219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mapping of quantitative trait loci controlling tick [Riphicephalus (Boophilus) microplus] resistance on bovine chromosomes 5, 7 and 14.
    Gasparin G; Miyata M; Coutinho LL; Martinez ML; Teodoro RL; Furlong J; Machado MA; Silva MV; Sonstegard TS; Regitano LC
    Anim Genet; 2007 Oct; 38(5):453-9. PubMed ID: 17894560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Expression of immune response genes in peripheral blood of cattle infested with Rhipicephalus microplus.
    Domingues R; Wohlres-Viana S; Reis DR; Teixeira HC; Ferreira AP; Guimarães SE; Prata MC; Furlong J; Verneque RS; Machado MA
    Genet Mol Res; 2014 May; 13(2):4013-21. PubMed ID: 24938612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.