151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1985351)
1. The role of mammographic parenchymal patterns in screening for carcinoma of the breast.
Kalisher L; McLelland R
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Jan; 172(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 1985351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Mammography].
Grégoire A; Bernard C; Lavallée G; Morin C; Philie M
Union Med Can; 1992; 121(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 1413293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast cancer in nonpalpable lesions: can mammographic parenchymal pattern improve the predictive value of biopsy?
Weaver M
Am Surg; 1992 Nov; 58(11):692-4. PubMed ID: 1485702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Process mapping boosts mammography's efficiency and quality.
Whitman GJ; Venable SL; Stelling CB; Kushwaha AC; Harrington A; Lifshitz O
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Sep; 21(9):53-5. PubMed ID: 10623318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [The technique and results of mammography].
Friedrich M
Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):243-59. PubMed ID: 8516435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Breast cancer screening: a current topic].
Gilles R; Dilhuydy M
J Radiol; 2001 Jun; 82(6 Pt 1):619-20. PubMed ID: 11449163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of mammography on breast biopsy.
Goedde TA; Frykberg ER; Crump JM; Lay SF; Turetsky DB; Linden SS
Am Surg; 1992 Nov; 58(11):661-6. PubMed ID: 1485695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recent controversies in mammography screening for breast cancer.
McTiernan A
Medscape Womens Health; 2002; 7(2):3. PubMed ID: 12142859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Wolfe mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer risk.
Sickles EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):301-3. PubMed ID: 17242234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Mammographic screening fulfills the requirements of health control].
Sandelin K
Lakartidningen; 1999 Mar; 96(9):983-4. PubMed ID: 10093435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammographic parenchymal patterns. Risk indicator for breast cancer?
Tabár L; Dean PB
JAMA; 1982 Jan; 247(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 7053455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Breast cancer screening by mammography: evaluation by Gotzsche and Olsen meta-analysis].
Agence Nationale d'Accrédiation et d'Evaluation en Santé
J Radiol; 2003 Mar; 84(3):336-41. PubMed ID: 12741380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammographic parenchymal patterns as risk indicators for incident cancer in a screening program: an extended analysis.
Krook PM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Dec; 131(6):1031-5. PubMed ID: 104567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Re: Reason for late-stage breast cancer: absence of screening or detection, or breakdown in follow-up?
Whittemore AS
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(5):400; author reply 400-1. PubMed ID: 15741577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Is clinical breast examination an acceptable alternative to mammographic screening?
Mittra I; Baum M; Thornton H; Houghton J
BMJ; 2000 Oct; 321(7268):1071-3. PubMed ID: 11053185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer risk. A case control study of a population-based screening experience.
Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Cecchini S; Cirillo A
Radiol Med; 1990 Apr; 79(4):346-8. PubMed ID: 2377751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Mammographic parenchymal pattern and risk of breast cancer (author's transl)].
Hüppe JR
Rofo; 1981 Jun; 134(6):638-42. PubMed ID: 6454623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Canadian National Breast Screening Study.
Owen G
CMAJ; 1993 Mar; 148(6):877, 880; 880-3. PubMed ID: 8166772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Current issues in mammographic breast cancer screening.
Rickard MT
Hosp Med; 1999 May; 60(5):325-8. PubMed ID: 10396406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical dilemma: The missing mammographic abnormality.
Kerin MJ; Monson JR
Br J Surg; 1999 Jul; 86(7):851-2. PubMed ID: 10417553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
