These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. [Mammographic screening is a reliable examination method]. Dean PB Lakartidningen; 2001 Dec; 98(51-52):5924-6. PubMed ID: 11806274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [European recommendations for quality assurance in the setting of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Report of pathologists of the working group "Breast Cancer Screening" of the European Union]. Ann Pathol; 1996 Nov; 16(5):315-33. PubMed ID: 9004719 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Mass screening for breast cancer in Herault county. First results in women between 40 and 70 years old]. Daures JP; Peray P; Bousquet J; Stoebner A; Gouzes C; Lamarque JL; Laurent JC; Cherif Cheikh J; Boulet P; Pujol J J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1992; 21(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 1583294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Discriminating analysis uncovers breast lesions. Kopans DB Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1991 Sep; 13(9):94-101. PubMed ID: 10149734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Principles and first results of the European program of breast cancer screening in the Bas-Rhin]. Renaud R; Schaffer P; Gairard B; Dale G; Haehnel P; Kleitz C; Guldenfels C Bull Acad Natl Med; 1991 Jan; 175(1):129-45; discussion 145-7. PubMed ID: 1863855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Initiating a National Mammographic Screening Program: The Kuwait Experience Training With a US Cancer Center. Mango VL; Al-Khawari H; Dershaw DD; Ashkanani MH; Pennisi B; Turner P; Thornton C; Morris EA J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Feb; 16(2):202-207. PubMed ID: 30266407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Screening mammography under age 50. Antman K; Shea S JAMA; 1999 Apr; 281(16):1470-2. PubMed ID: 10227298 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. New Zealand's first population based breast cancer screening programme. Elwood JM; Doyle TC; Richardson AK N Z Med J; 1991 Jun; 104(914):258-60. PubMed ID: 2057153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Factors influencing quality of mammograms]. Loewe C; Fuchsjäger M; Helbich TH Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2003; 115 Suppl 2():40-5. PubMed ID: 15518145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mammographic patterns and breast cancer risk: methodologic standards and contradictory results. Boyd NF; O'Sullivan B; Fishell E; Simor I; Cooke G J Natl Cancer Inst; 1984 Jun; 72(6):1253-9. PubMed ID: 6587146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Screening mammography--potential problems on the horizon. Hall FM N Engl J Med; 1986 Jan; 314(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 3940318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Breast cancer screening. Interpreting new data for clinical practice. Daly L Physician Assist; 1994 Oct; 18(10):47-51, 56, 61-6. PubMed ID: 10138304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mammography and early breast cancer detection. Bassett LW; Butler DL Am Fam Physician; 1991 Feb; 43(2):547-57. PubMed ID: 1990738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and the prevalence of breast cancer. Peyster RG; Kalisher L; Cole P Radiology; 1977 Nov; 125(2):387-91. PubMed ID: 910050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]