281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19853535)
1. Effect of planning margin on dosimetric quality in 131Cs permanent prostate brachytherapy.
Li T; Fountain BL; Duffy EW
Brachytherapy; 2010; 9(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 19853535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of non-exclusion of the rectum from the boost PTV in IMRT treatment plans for prostate cancer patients.
Kassim I; Dirkx ML; Heijmen BJ
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Jul; 92(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 19278745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of inverse planning simulated annealing and geometrical optimization for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Hsu IC; Lessard E; Weinberg V; Pouliot J
Brachytherapy; 2004; 3(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 15533807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Postprostatectomy target-normal structure overlap volume differences using computed tomography and radioimmunoscintigraphy images for radiotherapy treatment planning.
Su A; Blend MJ; Spelbring D; Hamilton RJ; Jani AB
Clin Nucl Med; 2006 Mar; 31(3):139-44. PubMed ID: 16495731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning.
Jiang R; Barnett RB; Chow JC; Chen JZ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 17301465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma of the thigh.
Hong L; Alektiar KM; Hunt M; Venkatraman E; Leibel SA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jul; 59(3):752-9. PubMed ID: 15183478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric consequences of intrafraction prostate motion.
Li HS; Chetty IJ; Enke CA; Foster RD; Willoughby TR; Kupellian PA; Solberg TD
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jul; 71(3):801-12. PubMed ID: 18234439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of changing technique, dose, and PTV margin on therapeutic ratio during prostate radiotherapy.
Huang SH; Catton C; Jezioranski J; Bayley A; Rose S; Rosewall T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jul; 71(4):1057-64. PubMed ID: 18339487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of the radial function on I-125 seeds used for permanent prostate implantation.
Pickett B; Pouliot J
Med Dosim; 2004; 29(3):204-9. PubMed ID: 15324917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study of seed localization and dose calculation on pre- and post-implantation ultrasound and CT images for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Ali I; Algan O; Thompson S; Sindhwani P; Herman T; Cheng CY; Ahmad S
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5595-611. PubMed ID: 19717887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anatomy-based inverse planning simulated annealing optimization in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: significant dosimetric advantage over other optimization techniques.
Jacob D; Raben A; Sarkar A; Grimm J; Simpson L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Nov; 72(3):820-7. PubMed ID: 18455325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraoperative real-time planned conformal prostate brachytherapy: post-implantation dosimetric outcome and clinical implications.
Zelefsky MJ; Yamada Y; Cohen GN; Sharma N; Shippy AM; Fridman D; Zaider M
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Aug; 84(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 17692978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of MLC leaf width and PTV margin on the treatment planning of intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery (IMSRS) or radiotherapy (IMSRT).
Chang J; Yenice KM; Jiang K; Hunt M; Narayana A
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 19410139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility of adequate dose coverage in permanent prostate brachytherapy using divergent needle insertion methods.
van den Bosch MR; Lips IM; Lagerburg V; van Vulpen M; Lagendijk JJ; Moerland MA
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jan; 86(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 18037520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Persistently better treatment planning results of intensity-modulated (IMRT) over conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in prostate cancer patients with significant variation of clinical target volume and/or organs-at-risk.
Fenoglietto P; Laliberte B; Allaw A; Ailleres N; Idri K; Hay MH; Moscardo CL; Gourgou S; Dubois JB; Azria D
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 18215434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Importance of protocol target definition on the ability to spare normal tissue: an IMRT and 3D-CRT planning comparison for intraorbital tumors.
Hein PA; Gladstone DJ; Bellerive MR; Hug EB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Aug; 62(5):1540-8. PubMed ID: 16029816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does inverse planning applied to Iridium192 high dose rate prostate brachytherapy improve the optimization of the dose afforded by the Paris system?
Nickers P; Lenaerts E; Thissen B; Deneufbourg JM
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Feb; 74(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 15734200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric consequences of the application of off-line setup error correction protocols and a hull-volume definition strategy for intensity modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
Baum C; Birkner M; Alber M; Paulsen F; Nüsslin F
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Jul; 76(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 16019092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variability of prostate brachytherapy pre-implant dosimetry: a multi-institutional analysis.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Wallner KE; Blasko JC; Michalski J; Aronowitz J; Grimm P; Moran BJ; McLaughlin PW; Usher J; Lief JH; Allen ZA
Brachytherapy; 2005; 4(4):241-51. PubMed ID: 16344253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adequate margins for random setup uncertainties in head-and-neck IMRT.
Astreinidou E; Bel A; Raaijmakers CP; Terhaard CH; Lagendijk JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):938-44. PubMed ID: 15708278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
