188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19853899)
1. Trial design for evaluation of novel targeted therapies.
Farley J; Rose PG
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Feb; 116(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 19853899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Novel designs and end points for phase II clinical trials.
Adjei AA; Christian M; Ivy P
Clin Cancer Res; 2009 Mar; 15(6):1866-72. PubMed ID: 19276272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Phase II clinical trials in oncology: are we hitting the target?
Ang MK; Tan SB; Lim WT
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2010 Mar; 10(3):427-38. PubMed ID: 20214523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving the design of phase II trials of cytostatic anticancer agents.
Stone A; Wheeler C; Barge A
Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 16843736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Phase II clinical trial design: methods in translational research from the Genitourinary Committee at the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.
Gray R; Manola J; Saxman S; Wright J; Dutcher J; Atkins M; Carducci M; See W; Sweeney C; Liu G; Stein M; Dreicer R; Wilding G; DiPaola RS
Clin Cancer Res; 2006 Apr; 12(7 Pt 1):1966-9. PubMed ID: 16609005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Methodological approaches of clinical studies with targeted therapies].
Penel N; Saleron J; Lansiaux A; Clisant S; Adenis A; Fournier C; Duhamel A; Bonneterre J
Bull Cancer; 2008 Feb; 95(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 18304903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Llovet JM; Di Bisceglie AM; Bruix J; Kramer BS; Lencioni R; Zhu AX; Sherman M; Schwartz M; Lotze M; Talwalkar J; Gores GJ;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(10):698-711. PubMed ID: 18477802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Review of phase II trial designs used in studies of molecular targeted agents: outcomes and predictors of success in phase III.
El-Maraghi RH; Eisenhauer EA
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Mar; 26(8):1346-54. PubMed ID: 18285606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinical development paradigm for cancer vaccines and related biologics.
Hoos A; Parmiani G; Hege K; Sznol M; Loibner H; Eggermont A; Urba W; Blumenstein B; Sacks N; Keilholz U; Nichol G;
J Immunother; 2007 Jan; 30(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 17198079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Making the investigational oncology pipeline more efficient and effective: are we headed in the right direction?
LoRusso PM; Anderson AB; Boerner SA; Averbuch SD
Clin Cancer Res; 2010 Dec; 16(24):5956-62. PubMed ID: 21169248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Alternate endpoints for screening phase II studies.
Dhani N; Tu D; Sargent DJ; Seymour L; Moore MJ
Clin Cancer Res; 2009 Mar; 15(6):1873-82. PubMed ID: 19276273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing an experimental agent to a standard agent: relative merits of a one-arm or randomized two-arm Phase II design.
Taylor JM; Braun TM; Li Z
Clin Trials; 2006; 3(4):335-48. PubMed ID: 17060208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimal two-stage randomized multinomial designs for Phase II oncology trials.
Sun LZ; Chen C; Patel K
J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(3):485-93. PubMed ID: 19384690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimizing randomized phase II trials assessing tumor progression.
Stone A; Wheeler C; Carroll K; Barge A
Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 16807129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lessons learned from independent central review.
Ford R; Schwartz L; Dancey J; Dodd LE; Eisenhauer EA; Gwyther S; Rubinstein L; Sargent D; Shankar L; Therasse P; Verweij J
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Jan; 45(2):268-74. PubMed ID: 19101138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Testing the wrong hypothesis in phase II oncology trials: there is a better alternative.
Ratain MJ; Karrison TG
Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Feb; 13(3):781-2. PubMed ID: 17289865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical trials of novel and targeted therapies: endpoints, trial design, and analysis.
Suman VJ; Dueck A; Sargent DJ
Cancer Invest; 2008 Jun; 26(5):439-44. PubMed ID: 18568764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimising the design of phase II oncology trials: the importance of randomisation.
Ratain MJ; Sargent DJ
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Jan; 45(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 19059773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimal and minimax three-stage designs for phase II oncology clinical trials.
Chen K; Shan M
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jan; 29(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17544337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An adaptive seamless phase II/III design for oncology trials with subpopulation selection using correlated survival endpoints.
Jenkins M; Stone A; Jennison C
Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):347-56. PubMed ID: 22328327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
