These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Cue combination in a combined feature contrast detection and figure identification task. Meinhardt G; Persike M; Mesenholl B; Hagemann C Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(23):3977-93. PubMed ID: 16962156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The electrophysiological correlate of contour integration is modulated by task demands. Mathes B; Trenner D; Fahle M Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):98-112. PubMed ID: 16945355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The orienting of visuospatial attention: an event-related brain potential study. Talsma D; Slagter HA; Nieuwenhuis S; Hage J; Kok A Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):117-29. PubMed ID: 15925498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Task difficulty modulates electrophysiological correlates of perceptual learning. Wang Y; Song Y; Qu Z; Ding Y Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 19969030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study. Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Nummenmaa L; Astikainen P Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():123-36. PubMed ID: 18485332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Response inhibition and attention processing in 5- to 7-year-old children with and without symptoms of ADHD: An ERP study. Spronk M; Jonkman LM; Kemner C Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Dec; 119(12):2738-52. PubMed ID: 18951061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceptual learning modulates electrophysiological and psychophysical response to visual texture segmentation in humans. Casco C; Campana G; Grieco A; Fuggetta G Neurosci Lett; 2004 Nov; 371(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 15500959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flexibility in spatial and non-spatial feature grouping: an event-related potentials study. Nikolaev AR; van Leeuwen C Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 22(1):13-25. PubMed ID: 15561496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Orienting attention to objects in visual short-term memory. Dell'Acqua R; Sessa P; Toffanin P; Luria R; Jolicoeur P Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan; 48(2):419-28. PubMed ID: 19804791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unavoidable errors: a spatio-temporal analysis of time-course and neural sources of evoked potentials associated with error processing in a speeded task. Vocat R; Pourtois G; Vuilleumier P Neuropsychologia; 2008 Aug; 46(10):2545-55. PubMed ID: 18533202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The neural processing fate of singleton target and nontarget stimuli. Akyürek EG; Dinkelbach A; Schubö A Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1307():115-33. PubMed ID: 19833112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing. He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is the error-related negativity amplitude related to error detectability? Evidence from effects of different error types. Maier M; Steinhauser M; Hübner R J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 20(12):2263-73. PubMed ID: 18457501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attention modulates psychophysical and electrophysiological response to visual texture segmentation in humans. Casco C; Grieco A; Campana G; Corvino MP; Caputo G Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(18):2384-96. PubMed ID: 15979464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]