160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19855867)
1. STARE-HI -statement on reporting of evaluation studies in health informatics.
Talmon J; Ammenwerth E; Brender J; de Keizer N; Nykänen P; Rigby M
Yearb Med Inform; 2009; ():23-31. PubMed ID: 19855867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. STARE-HI--Statement on reporting of evaluation studies in Health Informatics.
Talmon J; Ammenwerth E; Brender J; de Keizer N; Nykänen P; Rigby M
Int J Med Inform; 2009 Jan; 78(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18930696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. STARE-HI - Statement on Reporting of Evaluation Studies in Health Informatics: explanation and elaboration.
Brender J; Talmon J; de Keizer N; Nykänen P; Rigby M; Ammenwerth E
Appl Clin Inform; 2013; 4(3):331-58. PubMed ID: 24155788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Systematic prioritization of the STARE-HI reporting items. An application to short conference papers on health informatics evaluation.
de Keizer NF; Talmon J; Ammenwerth E; Brender J; Rigby M; Nykanen P
Methods Inf Med; 2012; 51(2):104-11. PubMed ID: 21373719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Guideline for good evaluation practice in health informatics (GEP-HI).
Nykänen P; Brender J; Talmon J; de Keizer N; Rigby M; Beuscart-Zephir MC; Ammenwerth E
Int J Med Inform; 2011 Dec; 80(12):815-27. PubMed ID: 21920809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The quality of reporting of health informatics evaluation studies: a pilot study.
Talmon J; Ammenwerth E; Geven T
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2007; 129(Pt 1):193-7. PubMed ID: 17911705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mini Stare-HI: guidelines for reporting health informatics evaluations in conference papers.
de Keizer NF; Talmon J; Ammenwerth E; Brender J; Nykanen P; Rigby M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 2):1206-10. PubMed ID: 20841875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reporting qualitative research in health informatics: REQ-HI recommendations.
Niazkhani Z; Pirnejad H; Aarts J; Adams S; Bal R
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 169():877-81. PubMed ID: 21893872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.
Husereau D; Drummond M; Petrou S; Carswell C; Moher D; Greenberg D; Augustovski F; Briggs AH; Mauskopf J; Loder E;
Value Health; 2013; 16(2):231-50. PubMed ID: 23538175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving the quality of the evidence base of health informatics.
Talmon J
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2008 Nov; ():1211-2. PubMed ID: 18999055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Guidance for preparing evaluation reports in telemedicine and health informatics generally.
Hailey D
J Telemed Telecare; 2007; 13(7):325-6. PubMed ID: 17958931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Publishing Health IT Evaluation Studies.
Ammenwerth E; de Keizer NF
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 222():304-11. PubMed ID: 27198112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The quality of evidence in health informatics: how did the quality of healthcare IT evaluation publications develop from 1982 to 2005?
de Keizer NF; Ammenwerth E
Int J Med Inform; 2008 Jan; 77(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 17208040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A viewpoint on evidence-based health informatics, based on a pilot survey on evaluation studies in health care informatics.
Ammenwerth E; de Keizer N
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2007; 14(3):368-71. PubMed ID: 17329724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Introducing guidelines for good evaluation practice in health informatics.
Nykänen P; Brender J; Ammenwerth E; Talmon J; de Keizer N; Rigby M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 150():958-62. PubMed ID: 19745455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Applying GEP-HI for the planning of an evaluation study: a case study walkthrough (workshop).
Nykänen P; Brender J; Ammenwerth E; Talmon J; Rigby M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 174():134-6. PubMed ID: 22491127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Publication bias in medical informatics evaluation research: is it an issue or not?
Machan C; Ammenwerth E; Bodner T
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 124():957-62. PubMed ID: 17108634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changing expectations: Do journals drive methodological changes? Should they?
Erb HN
Prev Vet Med; 2010 Dec; 97(3-4):165-74. PubMed ID: 20951447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
