These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19855867)

  • 41. [Reporting guidelines are also useful for readers of medical research publications: CONSORT, STARD, STROBE and others].
    Meerpohl JJ; Blümle A; Antes G; Elm Ev
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Oct; 134(41):2078-83. PubMed ID: 19802771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Scientific authorship. Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines.
    Claxton LD
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jan; 589(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 15652225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Editorial policy and the reporting of randomized controlled trials: a survey of instructions for authors and assessment of trial reports in Indian medical journals (2004-05).
    Tharyan P; Premkumar TS; Mathew V; Barnabas JP; Manuelraj
    Natl Med J India; 2008; 21(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 18807310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Factors influencing editors' decision on acceptance or rejection of manuscripts: the authors' perspective.
    Shakiba B; Salmasian H; Yousefi-Nooraie R; Rohanizadegan M
    Arch Iran Med; 2008 May; 11(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 18426315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Quality of Health IT Evaluations.
    Nykänen P; Kaipio J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 222():291-303. PubMed ID: 27198111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Reporting of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials with a focus on drug safety: an empirical assessment.
    Hammad TA; Neyarapally GA; Pinheiro SP; Iyasu S; Rochester G; Dal Pan G
    Clin Trials; 2013; 10(3):389-97. PubMed ID: 23508987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Ethics and methods for biological rhythm research on animals and human beings.
    Portaluppi F; Smolensky MH; Touitou Y
    Chronobiol Int; 2010 Oct; 27(9-10):1911-29. PubMed ID: 20969531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of Health IT in Low-Income Countries.
    Oluoch T; de Keizer NF
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 222():324-35. PubMed ID: 27198114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care trends in evaluation research 1982-2002.
    Ammenwerth E; de Keizer N
    Methods Inf Med; 2005; 44(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 15778794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. On using references as evidence.
    Brender J; Talmon J
    Methods Inf Med; 2009; 48(6):503-7. PubMed ID: 19893855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evidence-based Health Informatics and the Scientific Development of the Field.
    Wyatt JC
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 222():14-24. PubMed ID: 27198088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Finding, Appraising and Interpreting the Evidence of Health IT.
    Georgiou A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 222():312-23. PubMed ID: 27198113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Translating clinical informatics interventions into routine clinical care: how can the RE-AIM framework help?
    Bakken S; Ruland CM
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2009; 16(6):889-97. PubMed ID: 19717799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Translational research in medical informatics or from theory to practice. A call for an applied informatics journal.
    Lehmann CU; Altuwaijri MM; Li YC; Ball MJ; Haux R
    Methods Inf Med; 2008; 47(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 18213421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Medical informatics as a discipline at the beginning of the 21st century.
    Talmon JL; Hasman A
    Methods Inf Med; 2002; 41(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 11933762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Guidance for publishing qualitative research in informatics.
    Ancker JS; Benda NC; Reddy M; Unertl KM; Veinot T
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2021 Nov; 28(12):2743-2748. PubMed ID: 34537840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The use and interpretation of quasi-experimental studies in medical informatics.
    Harris AD; McGregor JC; Perencevich EN; Furuno JP; Zhu J; Peterson DE; Finkelstein J
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2006; 13(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 16221933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Theoretical report: reflections and considerations for authors, reviewers, and editors.
    Souza Filho BAB; Tritany ÉF; Struchiner CJ
    Rev Saude Publica; 2022; 56():30. PubMed ID: 35476108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evidence appraisal: a scoping review, conceptual framework, and research agenda.
    Goldstein A; Venker E; Weng C
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Nov; 24(6):1192-1203. PubMed ID: 28541552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Improving Evaluation to Address the Unintended Consequences of Health Information Technology:. a Position Paper from the Working Group on Technology Assessment & Quality Development.
    Magrabi F; Ammenwerth E; Hyppönen H; de Keizer N; Nykänen P; Rigby M; Scott P; Talmon J; Georgiou A
    Yearb Med Inform; 2016 Nov; (1):61-69. PubMed ID: 27830232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.