127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19856275)
1. Classification of array CGH data using smoothed logistic regression model.
Huang J; Salim A; Lei K; O'Sullivan K; Pawitan Y
Stat Med; 2009 Dec; 28(30):3798-810. PubMed ID: 19856275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robust smooth segmentation approach for array CGH data analysis.
Huang J; Gusnanto A; O'Sullivan K; Staaf J; Borg A; Pawitan Y
Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(18):2463-9. PubMed ID: 17660206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Supervised classification of array CGH data with HMM-based feature selection.
Daemen A; Gevaert O; Leunen K; Legius E; Vergote I; De Moor B
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2009; ():468-79. PubMed ID: 19209723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A very fast and accurate method for calling aberrations in array-CGH data.
Benelli M; Marseglia G; Nannetti G; Paravidino R; Zara F; Bricarelli FD; Torricelli F; Magi A
Biostatistics; 2010 Jul; 11(3):515-8. PubMed ID: 20207682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mixture classification model based on clinical markers for breast cancer prognosis.
Zeng T; Liu J
Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):129-37. PubMed ID: 20005686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Collateral missing value imputation: a new robust missing value estimation algorithm for microarray data.
Sehgal MS; Gondal I; Dooley LS
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(10):2417-23. PubMed ID: 15731210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A continuous-index hidden Markov jump process for modeling DNA copy number data.
Stjernqvist S; Rydén T
Biostatistics; 2009 Oct; 10(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 19628640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A shifting level model algorithm that identifies aberrations in array-CGH data.
Magi A; Benelli M; Marseglia G; Nannetti G; Scordo MR; Torricelli F
Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):265-80. PubMed ID: 19948744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Denoising array-based comparative genomic hybridization data using wavelets.
Hsu L; Self SG; Grove D; Randolph T; Wang K; Delrow JJ; Loo L; Porter P
Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):211-26. PubMed ID: 15772101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.
Varma S; Simon R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():91. PubMed ID: 16504092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gene selection in cancer classification using sparse logistic regression with Bayesian regularization.
Cawley GC; Talbot NL
Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(19):2348-55. PubMed ID: 16844704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Weighted clustering of called array CGH data.
Van Wieringen WN; Van De Wiel MA; Ylstra B
Biostatistics; 2008 Jul; 9(3):484-500. PubMed ID: 18156651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genome-wide profiling of oral squamous cell carcinoma by array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Sparano A; Quesnelle KM; Kumar MS; Wang Y; Sylvester AJ; Feldman M; Sewell DA; Weinstein GS; Brose MS
Laryngoscope; 2006 May; 116(5):735-41. PubMed ID: 16652080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison study: applying segmentation to array CGH data for downstream analyses.
Willenbrock H; Fridlyand J
Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 21(22):4084-91. PubMed ID: 16159913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cancer classification and prediction using logistic regression with Bayesian gene selection.
Zhou X; Liu KY; Wong ST
J Biomed Inform; 2004 Aug; 37(4):249-59. PubMed ID: 15465478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of BRCA1-association in hereditary non-BRCA1/2 breast carcinomas with array-CGH.
Joosse SA; van Beers EH; Tielen IH; Horlings H; Peterse JL; Hoogerbrugge N; Ligtenberg MJ; Wessels LF; Axwijk P; Verhoef S; Hogervorst FB; Nederlof PM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Aug; 116(3):479-89. PubMed ID: 18704682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A segmentation/clustering model for the analysis of array CGH data.
Picard F; Robin S; Lebarbier E; Daudin JJ
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):758-66. PubMed ID: 17825008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Joint segmentation, calling, and normalization of multiple CGH profiles.
Picard F; Lebarbier E; Hoebeke M; Rigaill G; Thiam B; Robin S
Biostatistics; 2011 Jul; 12(3):413-28. PubMed ID: 21209153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Classification for high-throughput data with an optimal subset of principal components.
Song JJ; Ren Y; Yan F
Comput Biol Chem; 2009 Oct; 33(5):408-13. PubMed ID: 19748831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genomic alterations of chromosome region 11p as predictive marker by array comparative genomic hybridization in lung adenocarcinoma patients.
Sung JS; Park KH; Kim YH
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2010 Apr; 198(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 20303011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
