These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19856275)

  • 1. Classification of array CGH data using smoothed logistic regression model.
    Huang J; Salim A; Lei K; O'Sullivan K; Pawitan Y
    Stat Med; 2009 Dec; 28(30):3798-810. PubMed ID: 19856275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robust smooth segmentation approach for array CGH data analysis.
    Huang J; Gusnanto A; O'Sullivan K; Staaf J; Borg A; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(18):2463-9. PubMed ID: 17660206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Supervised classification of array CGH data with HMM-based feature selection.
    Daemen A; Gevaert O; Leunen K; Legius E; Vergote I; De Moor B
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2009; ():468-79. PubMed ID: 19209723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A very fast and accurate method for calling aberrations in array-CGH data.
    Benelli M; Marseglia G; Nannetti G; Paravidino R; Zara F; Bricarelli FD; Torricelli F; Magi A
    Biostatistics; 2010 Jul; 11(3):515-8. PubMed ID: 20207682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mixture classification model based on clinical markers for breast cancer prognosis.
    Zeng T; Liu J
    Artif Intell Med; 2010; 48(2-3):129-37. PubMed ID: 20005686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Collateral missing value imputation: a new robust missing value estimation algorithm for microarray data.
    Sehgal MS; Gondal I; Dooley LS
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(10):2417-23. PubMed ID: 15731210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A continuous-index hidden Markov jump process for modeling DNA copy number data.
    Stjernqvist S; Rydén T
    Biostatistics; 2009 Oct; 10(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 19628640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A shifting level model algorithm that identifies aberrations in array-CGH data.
    Magi A; Benelli M; Marseglia G; Nannetti G; Scordo MR; Torricelli F
    Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):265-80. PubMed ID: 19948744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Denoising array-based comparative genomic hybridization data using wavelets.
    Hsu L; Self SG; Grove D; Randolph T; Wang K; Delrow JJ; Loo L; Porter P
    Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):211-26. PubMed ID: 15772101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.
    Varma S; Simon R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():91. PubMed ID: 16504092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gene selection in cancer classification using sparse logistic regression with Bayesian regularization.
    Cawley GC; Talbot NL
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Oct; 22(19):2348-55. PubMed ID: 16844704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Weighted clustering of called array CGH data.
    Van Wieringen WN; Van De Wiel MA; Ylstra B
    Biostatistics; 2008 Jul; 9(3):484-500. PubMed ID: 18156651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Platform comparisons for identification of breast cancers with a BRCA-like copy number profile.
    Schouten PC; van Dyk E; Braaf LM; Mulder L; Lips EH; de Ronde JJ; Holtman L; Wesseling J; Hauptmann M; Wessels LF; Linn SC; Nederlof PM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Jun; 139(2):317-27. PubMed ID: 23670131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genome-wide profiling of oral squamous cell carcinoma by array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
    Sparano A; Quesnelle KM; Kumar MS; Wang Y; Sylvester AJ; Feldman M; Sewell DA; Weinstein GS; Brose MS
    Laryngoscope; 2006 May; 116(5):735-41. PubMed ID: 16652080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison study: applying segmentation to array CGH data for downstream analyses.
    Willenbrock H; Fridlyand J
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 21(22):4084-91. PubMed ID: 16159913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cancer classification and prediction using logistic regression with Bayesian gene selection.
    Zhou X; Liu KY; Wong ST
    J Biomed Inform; 2004 Aug; 37(4):249-59. PubMed ID: 15465478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of BRCA1-association in hereditary non-BRCA1/2 breast carcinomas with array-CGH.
    Joosse SA; van Beers EH; Tielen IH; Horlings H; Peterse JL; Hoogerbrugge N; Ligtenberg MJ; Wessels LF; Axwijk P; Verhoef S; Hogervorst FB; Nederlof PM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Aug; 116(3):479-89. PubMed ID: 18704682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A segmentation/clustering model for the analysis of array CGH data.
    Picard F; Robin S; Lebarbier E; Daudin JJ
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):758-66. PubMed ID: 17825008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Joint segmentation, calling, and normalization of multiple CGH profiles.
    Picard F; Lebarbier E; Hoebeke M; Rigaill G; Thiam B; Robin S
    Biostatistics; 2011 Jul; 12(3):413-28. PubMed ID: 21209153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Classification for high-throughput data with an optimal subset of principal components.
    Song JJ; Ren Y; Yan F
    Comput Biol Chem; 2009 Oct; 33(5):408-13. PubMed ID: 19748831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.