These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19857000)

  • 1. The existence bias.
    Eidelman S; Crandall CS; Pattershall J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Nov; 97(5):765-75. PubMed ID: 19857000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: probability and the mental representation of events.
    Wakslak CJ; Trope Y; Liberman N; Alony R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):641-53. PubMed ID: 17087578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pseudodiagnosticity revisited.
    Crupi V; Tentori K; Lombardi L
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Oct; 116(4):971-85. PubMed ID: 19839693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Another look at why people are reluctant to exchange lottery tickets.
    Risen JL; Gilovich T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Jul; 93(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 17605585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neglect of alternative causes in predictive but not diagnostic reasoning.
    Fernbach PM; Darlow A; Sloman SA
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Mar; 21(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 20424064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Guessing imagined and live chance events: adults behave like children with live events.
    Robinson EJ; Pendle JE; Rowley MG; Beck SR; McColgan KL
    Br J Psychol; 2009 Nov; 100(Pt 4):645-59. PubMed ID: 19079952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automatic optimism: the affective basis of judgments about the likelihood of future events.
    Lench HC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May; 138(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 19397379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strategies for revising judgment: how (and how well) people use others' opinions.
    Soll JB; Larrick RP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):780-805. PubMed ID: 19379049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Children's understanding of posterior probability.
    Girotto V; Gonzalez M
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):325-44. PubMed ID: 17391661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decision-making processes: sensitivity to sequentially experienced outcome probabilities.
    Boyer TW
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2007 May; 97(1):28-43. PubMed ID: 17321540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The cost of richness: the effect of the size and diversity of decision sets on post-decision regret.
    Sagi A; Friedland N
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2007 Oct; 93(4):515-24. PubMed ID: 17892329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Value-induced bias in medical decision making.
    Levy AG; Hershey JC
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(2):269-76. PubMed ID: 18349431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Producing biased diagnoses with unambiguous stimuli: The importance of feature instantiations.
    Hannah SD; Brooks LR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1416-23. PubMed ID: 17087593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual differences in causal learning and decision making.
    Osman M; Shanks DR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Sep; 120(1):93-112. PubMed ID: 15982627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Friend or foe: the effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making.
    van 't Wout M; Sanfey AG
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):796-803. PubMed ID: 18721917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Précis of The rational imagination: how people create alternatives to reality.
    Byrne RM
    Behav Brain Sci; 2007 Dec; 30(5-6):439-53; discussion 453-76. PubMed ID: 18321404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fast and confident: postdicting eyewitness identification accuracy in a field study.
    Sauerland M; Sporer SL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):46-62. PubMed ID: 19309216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Driven by power? Probe question and presentation format effects on causal judgment.
    Perales JC; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1482-94. PubMed ID: 18980409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Justification pressure in risky decision making: search for risk defusing operators.
    Huber O; Bär AS; Huber OW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 18986637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decision makers conceive of their choices as interventions.
    Hagmayer Y; Sloman SA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):22-38. PubMed ID: 19203168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.