113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19858076)
1. Microleakage between composite-wire and composite-enamel interfaces of flexible spiral wire retainers. Part 1: comparison of three composites.
Uysal T; Baysal A; Usumez S; Ulker M
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Dec; 31(6):647-51. PubMed ID: 19858076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microleakage between composite-wire and composite-enamel interfaces of flexible spiral wire retainers. Part 2: comparison of amorphous calcium phosphate-containing adhesive with conventional lingual retainer composite.
Uysal T; Ulker M; Baysal A; Usumez S
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Dec; 31(6):652-7. PubMed ID: 19858075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microleakage between composite/wire and composite/enamel interfaces of flexible spiral wire retainers: direct versus indirect application methods.
Yagci A; Uysal T; Ertas H; Amasyali M
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2010 May; 13(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 20477972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Different lingual retainer composites and the microleakage between enamel-composite and wire-composite interfaces.
Uysal T; Ulker M; Baysal A; Usumez S
Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):941-6. PubMed ID: 18298203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microleakage under orthodontic brackets bonded with the custom base indirect bonding technique.
Yagci A; Uysal T; Ulker M; Ramoglu SI
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 19752016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of high-intensity curing lights on microleakage under bonded lingual retainers.
Baysal A; Uysal T; Ulker M; Usumez S
Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1084-8. PubMed ID: 18947287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microleakage beneath brackets bonded with flowable materials: effect of thermocycling.
Vicente A; Ortiz AJ; Bravo LA
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 19336628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of lingual retainer wires bonded with three different lingual retainer composites: an in vitro study.
Nimbalkar-Patil S; Vaz A; Patil PG
J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Nov; 8(11):ZC83-7. PubMed ID: 25584325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microleakage under lingual retainer composite bonded with an antibacterial monomer-containing adhesive system.
Uysal T; Ulker M; Baysal A; Usumez S
World J Orthod; 2009; 10(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 19885420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of microleakage and shear bond strength of ribbon and twisted wire retainers bonded on human mandibular incisors with two different types of adhesives with and without primer: An in-vitro study.
Kavousinejad S; Hosseinzadeh Nik T; Saffar Shahroudi A
Int Orthod; 2022 Dec; 20(4):100693. PubMed ID: 36243617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microleakage of cervical cavities restored with flowable composites.
Kubo S; Yokota H; Yokota H; Hayashi Y
Am J Dent; 2004 Feb; 17(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 15241907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Debonding force and deformation of two multi-stranded lingual retainer wires bonded to incisor enamel: an in vitro study.
Cooke ME; Sherriff M
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):741-6. PubMed ID: 20547494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tensile test and interface retention forces between wires and composites in lingual fixed retainers.
Paolone MG; Kaitsas R; Obach P; Kaitsas V; Benedicenti S; Sorrenti E; Barberis F
Int Orthod; 2015 Jun; 13(2):210-220. PubMed ID: 26003122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of two light-emitting diode (LED) and one halogen curing light on the microleakage of Class V flowable composite restorations.
Attar N; Korkmaz Y
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb; 8(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 17277830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of high-intensity curing lights on microleakage under orthodontic bands.
Uysal T; Ramoglu SI; Ulker M; Ertas H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 20691362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enamel surface after debracketing of orthodontic brackets bonded with flowable orthodontic composite. A comparison with a traditional orthodontic composite resin.
Tecco S; Tetè S; D'Attilio M; Festa F
Minerva Stomatol; 2008 Mar; 57(3):81-94. PubMed ID: 18427376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of two different polishing techniques on microleakage of new composites in Class V restorations.
Yalçin F; Korkmaz Y; Başeren M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):18-25. PubMed ID: 17091136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flowable composites as "filled adhesives:" a microleakage study.
Sensi LG; Marson FC; Monteiro S; Baratieri LN; Caldeira de Andrada MA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 Nov; 5(4):32-41. PubMed ID: 15558088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bond strengths of an antibacterial monomer-containing adhesive system applied with and without acid etching for lingual retainer bonding.
Ulker M; Uysal T; Ramoglu SI; Ucar FI
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Dec; 31(6):658-63. PubMed ID: 19487436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
