201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19859865)
1. [Assessment of clinical image quality in feline chest radiography with a needle-image plate (NIP) storage phosphor system--an approach to the evaluation of image quality in neonatal radiography].
Ludewig E; Hirsch W; Bosch B; Gäbler K; Sorge I; Succow D; Werrmann A; Gosch D
Rofo; 2010 Feb; 182(2):122-32. PubMed ID: 19859865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Initial clinical results with a new needle screen storage phosphor system in chest radiograms.
Körner M; Wirth S; Treitl M; Reiser M; Pfeifer KJ
Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1491-6. PubMed ID: 16302129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imaging performance with different doses in skeletal radiography: comparison of a needle-structured and a conventional storage phosphor system with a flat-panel detector.
Wirth S; Treitl M; Reiser MF; Körner M
Radiology; 2009 Jan; 250(1):152-60. PubMed ID: 19001150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility of dose reduction using needle-structured image plates versus powder-structured plates for computed radiography of the knee.
Gruber M; Weber M; Homolka P; Nemec S; Fruehwald-Pallamar J; Uffmann M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Aug; 197(2):W318-23. PubMed ID: 21785059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Needle image plates compared to conventional CR in chest radiography: is dose reduction possible?
Berger-Kulemann V; Pötter-Lang S; Gruber M; Berger R; Vonbank K; Weber M; Rabitsch W; Uffmann M
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):4156-60. PubMed ID: 21798682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Digital radiography: from storage phosphor plates to direct detector systems].
Schaefer-Prokop C; Uffmann M; Stadler A
Wien Med Wochenschr Suppl; 2002; (113):30-4. PubMed ID: 12621834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Depiction of low-contrast detail in digital radiography: comparison of powder- and needle-structured storage phosphor systems.
Körner M; Treitl M; Schaetzing R; Pfeifer KJ; Reiser M; Wirth S
Invest Radiol; 2006 Jul; 41(7):593-9. PubMed ID: 16772853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography.
Ganten M; Radeleff B; Kampschulte A; Daniels MD; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 12818852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Digital thorax radiography: flat-panel detector or storage phosphor plates].
Schaefer-Prokop C; Uffmann M; Sailer J; Kabalan N; Herold C; Prokop M
Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):351-61. PubMed ID: 12764583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital chest radiography with a selenium-based flat-panel detector versus a storage phosphor system: comparison of soft-copy images.
Goo JM; Im JG; Kim JH; Seo JB; Kim TS; Shine SJ; Lee W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Oct; 175(4):1013-8. PubMed ID: 11000155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Thoracic radiographs with the AMBER system. A comparison of the diagnostic image quality of film-screen and storage-phosphor radiographs on the grid-partition stand and the AMBER system].
Busch HP; Hartmann J; Freund MC; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M; Richter K
Rofo; 1992 Mar; 156(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 1550921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimization of exposure in panoramic radiography while maintaining image quality using adaptive filtering.
Svenson B; Larsson L; Båth M
Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 26478956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [High intensification film-screen systems in thoracic diagnosis. A clinical comparative study].
Schäfer CB; Sokiranski R; Claussen CD
Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 8580141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
Hamer OW; Sirlin CB; Strotzer M; Borisch I; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Völk M
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of the image quality of a storage phospor system and a flat-panel detector in feline thoracic radiography].
Ludewig E; Werrmann A; Gosch D; Oechtering G
Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere; 2010; 38(6):355-66. PubMed ID: 22212748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stimulable phosphor plates in chest radiology.
Tylén U
Eur Radiol; 1997; 7 Suppl 3():S83-6. PubMed ID: 9169106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].
Busch HP; Busch S; Decker C; Schilz C
Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12525978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Storage phosphor radiographs vs conventional films: interpreters' perceptions of diagnostic quality.
Fuhrman CR; Gur D; Good B; Rockette H; Cooperstein LA; Feist JH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 May; 150(5):1011-4. PubMed ID: 3258701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
