These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19859949)

  • 1. Model-based blind estimation of kinetic parameters in dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI.
    Fluckiger JU; Schabel MC; Dibella EV
    Magn Reson Med; 2009 Dec; 62(6):1477-86. PubMed ID: 19859949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of two methods for estimating DCE-MRI parameters via individual and cohort based AIFs in prostate cancer: a step towards practical implementation.
    Fedorov A; Fluckiger J; Ayers GD; Li X; Gupta SN; Tempany C; Mulkern R; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy FM
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 32(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 24560287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
    Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blind estimation of the arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using purity maximization.
    Lin YC; Chan TH; Chi CY; Ng SH; Liu HL; Wei KC; Wai YY; Wang CC; Wang JJ
    Magn Reson Med; 2012 Nov; 68(5):1439-49. PubMed ID: 22383386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer DCE-MRI at 3T: comparison of two arterial input functions on cancer detection with digitized whole mount histopathological validation.
    Fennessy FM; Fedorov A; Penzkofer T; Kim KW; Hirsch MS; Vangel MG; Masry P; Flood TA; Chang MC; Tempany CM; Mulkern RV; Gupta SN
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Sep; 33(7):886-94. PubMed ID: 25683515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel AIF tracking method and comparison of DCE-MRI parameters using individual and population-based AIFs in human breast cancer.
    Li X; Welch EB; Arlinghaus LR; Chakravarthy AB; Xu L; Farley J; Loveless ME; Mayer IA; Kelley MC; Meszoely IM; Means-Powell JA; Abramson VG; Grau AM; Gore JC; Yankeelov TE
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(17):5753-69. PubMed ID: 21841212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of model-based arterial input functions for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in tumor bearing rats.
    McGrath DM; Bradley DP; Tessier JL; Lacey T; Taylor CJ; Parker GJ
    Magn Reson Med; 2009 May; 61(5):1173-84. PubMed ID: 19253360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient-specific pharmacokinetic parameter estimation on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate: Preliminary evaluation of a novel AIF-free estimation method.
    Ginsburg SB; Taimen P; Merisaari H; Vainio P; Boström PJ; Aronen HJ; Jambor I; Madabhushi A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Dec; 44(6):1405-1414. PubMed ID: 27285161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer using independent component analysis.
    Mehrabian H; Da Rosa M; Haider MA; Martel AL
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 33(10):1236-1245. PubMed ID: 26297961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Subcompartmentalization of extracellular extravascular space (EES) into permeability and leaky space with local arterial input function (AIF) results in improved discrimination between high- and low-grade glioma using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.
    Sahoo P; Rathore RK; Awasthi R; Roy B; Verma S; Rathore D; Behari S; Husain M; Husain N; Pandey CM; Mohakud S; Gupta RK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Sep; 38(3):677-88. PubMed ID: 23390002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: II. In vivo results.
    Schabel MC; DiBella EV; Jensen RL; Salzman KL
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4807-23. PubMed ID: 20679695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A general dual-bolus approach for quantitative DCE-MRI.
    Kershaw LE; Cheng HL
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Feb; 29(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 21129878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single-channel blind estimation of arterial input function and tissue impulse response in DCE-MRI.
    Taxt T; Jirík R; Rygh CB; Grüner R; Bartos M; Andersen E; Curry FR; Reed RK
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Apr; 59(4):1012-21. PubMed ID: 22217906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: I. Simulations.
    Schabel MC; Fluckiger JU; DiBella EV
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4783-806. PubMed ID: 20679691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple reference tissue method for contrast agent arterial input function estimation.
    Yang C; Karczmar GS; Medved M; Stadler WM
    Magn Reson Med; 2007 Dec; 58(6):1266-75. PubMed ID: 17969061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An analysis of the pharmacokinetic parameter ratios in DCE-MRI using the reference region model.
    Lee J; Platt S; Kent M; Zhao Q
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jan; 30(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 22071409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of the effect of haematocrit-dependent arterial input functions on the accuracy of pharmacokinetic parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
    Just N; Koh DM; D'Arcy J; Collins DJ; Leach MO
    NMR Biomed; 2011 Aug; 24(7):902-15. PubMed ID: 21290457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repeatability of arterial input functions and kinetic parameters in muscle obtained by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of the head and neck.
    Koopman T; Martens RM; Lavini C; Yaqub M; Castelijns JA; Boellaard R; Marcus JT
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():1-8. PubMed ID: 31978517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy and precision of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters: How should one estimate contrast concentration?
    Wake N; Chandarana H; Rusinek H; Fujimoto K; Moy L; Sodickson DK; Kim SG
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 52():16-23. PubMed ID: 29777820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility of the gadolinium concentration measurements and of the fitting parameters of the vascular input function in the superior sagittal sinus in a patient population.
    Lavini C; Verhoeff JJ
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Dec; 28(10):1420-30. PubMed ID: 20817379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.