These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19861112)

  • 1. [Goodness of fit in polytomous items: Type I error rates and empirical power for three fit-indexes].
    Sueiro MJ; Abad FJ
    Psicothema; 2009 Nov; 21(4):639-45. PubMed ID: 19861112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment on homogeneity tests for kappa statistics under equal prevalence across studies in reliability.
    Nam JM
    Stat Med; 2006 May; 25(9):1521-31. PubMed ID: 16220477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Goodness-of-fit processes for logistic regression: simulation results.
    Hosmer DW; Hjort NL
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(18):2723-38. PubMed ID: 12228887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Global goodness-of-fit tests in logistic regression with sparse data.
    Kuss O
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3789-801. PubMed ID: 12483767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating the pi* goodness of fit index for finite mixtures of item response models.
    Revuelta J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):93-113. PubMed ID: 18482477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian item fit analysis for unidimensional item response theory models.
    Sinharay S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):429-49. PubMed ID: 17067420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A nonparametric smoothing method for assessing GEE models with longitudinal binary data.
    Lin KC; Chen YJ; Shyr Y
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4428-39. PubMed ID: 18613210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Item response theory analyses of physical functioning items in the medical outcomes study.
    Hays RD; Liu H; Spritzer K; Cella D
    Med Care; 2007 May; 45(5 Suppl 1):S32-8. PubMed ID: 17443117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysing multitrait-multimethod data with structural equation models for ordinal variables applying the WLSMV estimator: what sample size is needed for valid results?
    Nussbeck FW; Eid M; Lischetzke T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):195-213. PubMed ID: 16709286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Goodness-of-fit tests for ordinal response regression models.
    Pulkstenis E; Robinson TJ
    Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):999-1014. PubMed ID: 15027085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Bayesian chi-squared goodness-of-fit test for censored data models.
    Cao J; Moosman A; Johnson VE
    Biometrics; 2010 Jun; 66(2):426-34. PubMed ID: 19645701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A chi-square goodness-of-fit test for autoregressive logistic regression models with applications to patient screening.
    Hansen AM; Jeske D; Kirsch W
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 24854578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Goodness-of-fit tests for GEE modeling with binary responses.
    Barnhart HX; Williamson JM
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):720-9. PubMed ID: 9629652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Polytomous modeling of cognitive errors in computer adaptive testing.
    Wang L; Li CS
    J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(4):356-78. PubMed ID: 12011504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detecting differential item functioning with five standardized item-fit indices in the Rasch model.
    Seol H
    J Outcome Meas; 1999; 3(3):233-47. PubMed ID: 10431491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of an adjusted chi-square statistic as applied to observational studies involving clustered binary data.
    Jung SH; Ahn C; Donner A
    Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(14):2149-61. PubMed ID: 11439427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An empirical study on the relationship between teacher's judgments and fit statistics of the partial credit model.
    Baek SG; Kim HS
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 19299887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the chi-square approximation to the exact distribution of goodness-of-fit statistics in multinomial models with composite hypotheses.
    García-Pérez MA; Núñez-Antón VA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2004 May; 57(Pt 1):73-96. PubMed ID: 15171802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of three polytomous item response theory models in the context of testlet scoring.
    Cook KF; Dodd BG; Fitzpatrick SJ
    J Outcome Meas; 1999; 3(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 10063769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Type I errors and power of the parametric bootstrap goodness-of-fit test: full and limited information.
    Tollenaar N; Mooijaart A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):271-88. PubMed ID: 14633336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.