These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19861112)

  • 21. Rasch analysis of distractors in multiple-choice items.
    Wang WC
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(1):43-65. PubMed ID: 9661731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Maugeri Respiratory Failure questionnaire reduced form: a method for improving the questionnaire using the Rasch model.
    Vidotto G; Carone M; Jones PW; Salini S; Bertolotti G;
    Disabil Rehabil; 2007 Jul; 29(13):991-8. PubMed ID: 17612984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of discriminant logistic regression and Item Response Theory Likelihood-Ratio Tests for Differential Item Functioning (IRTLRDIF) in polytomous short tests.
    Hidalgo MD; López-Martínez MD; Gómez-Benito J; Guilera G
    Psicothema; 2016; 28(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 26820429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An investigation of factors affecting test equating in latent trait theory.
    Suanthong S; Schumacker RE; Beyerlein MM
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(1):25-43. PubMed ID: 12023556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Testing differences between nested covariance structure models: Power analysis and null hypotheses.
    MacCallum RC; Browne MW; Cai L
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Mar; 11(1):19-35. PubMed ID: 16594765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Two strategies for fitting real data to Rasch polytomous models.
    Rojas Tejada AJ; Gonzalez Gomez A; Padilla Garcia JL; Perez Melendez C
    J Appl Meas; 2002; 3(2):129-45. PubMed ID: 12011498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using polytomous item response models to assess death anxiety.
    Gómez J; Hidalgo MD; Tomás-Sábado J
    Nurs Res; 2007; 56(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17356439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Parameter recovery for the rating scale model using PARSCALE.
    French GA; Dodd BG
    J Outcome Meas; 1999; 3(2):176-99. PubMed ID: 10204326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of goodness of fit tests for the logistic GEE model.
    Evans S; Li L
    Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(8):1245-61. PubMed ID: 15580592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using item mean squares to evaluate fit to the Rasch model.
    Smith RM; Schumacker RE; Bush MJ
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(1):66-78. PubMed ID: 9661732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. On testing departure from the binomial and multinomial assumptions.
    Paul SR; Liang KY; Self SG
    Biometrics; 1989 Mar; 45(1):231-6. PubMed ID: 2720053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Two goodness-of-fit tests for logistic regression models with continuous covariates.
    Pulkstenis E; Robinson TJ
    Stat Med; 2002 Jan; 21(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 11782052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Simulation study comparing interval estimates for the recombination fraction.
    Nemesure BB; Greenberg DA; Mendell NR
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 8536952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of item response theory models for sparse 2 tables.
    Cai L; Maydeu-Olivares A; Coffman DL; Thissen D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):173-94. PubMed ID: 16709285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluating the goodness of fit in models of sparse medical data: a simulation approach.
    Boyle P; Flowerdew R; Williams A
    Int J Epidemiol; 1997 Jun; 26(3):651-6. PubMed ID: 9222792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of global testing procedures for item fit to the Rasch model.
    Suárez-Falcón JC; Glas CA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 May; 56(Pt 1):127-43. PubMed ID: 12803827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of methods for analyzing binary data arising from two-sample twin studies.
    Gao XJ; Klar N; Donner A
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(4):349-63. PubMed ID: 9271709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Logistic response models with item interactions.
    Revuelta J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):32-55. PubMed ID: 22233175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Performance of the likelihood ratio difference (G2 Diff) test for detecting unidimensionality in applications of the multidimensional Rasch model.
    Harrell-Williams L; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 24992250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.