These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Peer review and new investigators. Taffe MA Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5762):775. PubMed ID: 16469900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. National Institutes of Health. Zerhouni's parting message: make room for young scientists. Kaiser J Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5903):834-5. PubMed ID: 18988813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Research funding: peer review at NIH. Scarpa T Science; 2006 Jan; 311(5757):41. PubMed ID: 16400135 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. American Idol and NIH grant review--redux. Munger K Cell; 2006 Nov; 127(4):661-2; author reply 664-5. PubMed ID: 17110320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review at NIH: a conversation with CSR director Toni Scarpa. Scarpa T Physiologist; 2010 Jun; 53(3):65, 67-9. PubMed ID: 20550006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. NIH needs a makeover. Dey SK Science; 2009 Aug; 325(5943):944. PubMed ID: 19696331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Revamp for NIH grants. Wadman M Nature; 2008 Feb; 451(7182):1035. PubMed ID: 18305502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Making research accessible: National Institutes of Health (NIH) public access and PNAS open access policies. Cozzarelli NR Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 Apr; 102(15):5303. PubMed ID: 15809413 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Does peer review at the US National Institutes of Health need modifying? Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Mar; 16(3):390. PubMed ID: 18339262 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]